[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"trial:NCT05509608":3,"trial-entities:NCT05509608":102,"trial-summary:NCT05509608":106},{"id":4,"nct_id":4,"org_study_id":5,"brief_title":6,"official_title":7,"overall_status":8,"completion_date":9,"status_verified_date":10,"last_update_date":11,"start_date":12,"sponsor_name":13,"lead_sponsor_class":14,"has_dmc":15,"brief_summary":16,"detailed_description":17,"conditions":18,"keywords":20,"study_type":28,"primary_purpose":29,"phases":30,"enrollment_info":32,"interventions":35,"primary_outcomes":47,"secondary_outcomes":55,"sex":56,"minimum_age":57,"maximum_age":17,"healthy_volunteers":58,"eligibility_criteria":59,"std_ages":69,"locations":72,"central_contacts":86,"overall_officials":87,"references":93,"see_also_links":101},"NCT05509608","RMEFDA2022","Evaluating a New Sensor That Measures the Health of the Retina in Normally-sighted Subjects","Evaluation of an Electroretinogram Sensor","ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION","2025-12-31","2025-09","2025-11-14","2023-03-01","RetMap, Inc","INDUSTRY",false,"The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of a new contact lens electrode to record a measurable electroretinogram (ERG). ERG sensors in various forms have been in common clinical use for more than 50 years. The ERG sensor that is the subject of this study is the RM Electrode, developed by RetMap, Inc. (project sponsor). The RM Electrode is not yet approved by the FDA. The RM Electrode will be compared to other commercially available electrode\n\nThe first Aim of the present study is to compare the functionality of the RM Electrode and other commercially available electrodes. Following standard ERG test protocols, responses will be recorded from ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects using both electrodes (used in random order). The signal quality of the ERG responses obtained from both contact lens electrodes will be compared. Signal quality will be determined by measuring ERG signal amplitudes and calculating signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Signal-to-noise ratios will be used to establish substantial equivalence. ERG test results will not be used to determine the effect of the devices on the participants.\n\nThe second Aim of the present study is to evaluate the risk of ocular irritation caused by use of the RM Electrode compared to other commercially available electrodes. A typical ERG test session lasts 20 minutes. Ten healthy (normally-sighted) adult subjects will wear the RM Electrode on one eye and a commercially available electrode on the other eye, for a total of 60 minutes, in 20-minute sessions with short breaks in between. To determine the effect of the devices on the participants, the eyes will be evaluated for irritation.",null,[19],"Electrode Site Reaction",[21,22,23,24,25,26,27],"Electroretinogram","Sensor","Retina","Contact lens","Electrode","Efficacy","Feasibility","INTERVENTIONAL","OTHER",[31],"EARLY_PHASE1",{"count":33,"type":34},90,"ESTIMATED",[36,43],{"type":37,"name":38,"description":39,"armGroupLabels":40},"DEVICE","RM Electrode","The RM Electrode is a corneal ERG electrode. The distinguishing features of the RM electrode are that it is a soft contact lens with a recessed electrode (i.e. no metal electrode makes direct contact with the eye). The RM Electrode also has an integral speculum to hold the wearer's eye lids open. The electrode is designed for superior positional stability on the eye during testing. These features work together to improve ERG signal quality.",[41,42],"Electroretinogram Signal Quality","Ocular Irritation",{"type":37,"name":44,"description":45,"armGroupLabels":46},"ERG Jet Electrode","The ERG Jet electrode is an FDA approved, commercially available corneal ERG electrode.",[41,42],[48,52],{"measure":49,"description":50,"timeFrame":51},"Arm1: ERG signal quality, including peak amplitudes, noise levels, and signal to noise ratios.","Signals recorded from both contact lens electrode will be evaluated for a-wave and b-wave peak amplitudes, signal power, noise power and signal-to-noise ratios.","Up to 24 weeks",{"measure":53,"description":54,"timeFrame":51},"Arm 2: Ocular irritation using clinical grading scales","Slit-lamp examination and standard clinical grading scales for bulbar redness, limbal redness, tarsal redness, and corneal staining (fluorescein).",[],"ALL","18 Years",true,{"inclusion":60,"exclusion":62,"raw_text":68},[61],"Persons 18 and over.",[63,64,65,66,67],"Pregnant woman","Individuals with existing diagnosis for any retinal disease, ocular surgery (including refractive surgery such as Lasik) within the past six months, corneal ulcers, or any noticeable ocular irritation on the study day.","Non-English speaking persons may not enroll.","Persons who may respond negatively to flashing lights in the eye will be excluded, or excused from the study if enrolled and the negative response is revealed during the study.","No vulnerable populations are expected to enroll.","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Persons 18 and over.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Pregnant woman\n* Individuals with existing diagnosis for any retinal disease, ocular surgery (including refractive surgery such as Lasik) within the past six months, corneal ulcers, or any noticeable ocular irritation on the study day.\n* Non-English speaking persons may not enroll.\n* Persons who may respond negatively to flashing lights in the eye will be excluded, or excused from the study if enrolled and the negative response is revealed during the study.\n\nExcluded or Vulnerable Populations:\n\n* No vulnerable populations are expected to enroll.",[70,71],"ADULT","OLDER_ADULT",[73,82],{"facility":74,"city":75,"state":76,"zip":77,"country":78,"geoPoint":79},"UIC Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences","Chicago","Illinois","60612","United States",{"lat":80,"lon":81},41.85003,-87.65005,{"facility":83,"city":75,"state":76,"zip":84,"country":78,"geoPoint":85},"Illinois College of Optometry","60616",{"lat":80,"lon":81},[],[88,91],{"name":89,"affiliation":74,"role":90},"Robert Hyde, MD\u002FPhD","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"name":92,"affiliation":83,"role":90},"Michael Chaglasian, OD",[94,98],{"pmid":95,"type":96,"citation":97},"25502644","BACKGROUND","McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, Hamilton R, Holder GE, Tzekov R, Bach M. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;130(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs10633-014-9473-7. Epub 2014 Dec 14.",{"pmid":99,"type":96,"citation":100},"33492495","Hoffmann MB, Bach M, Kondo M, Li S, Walker S, Holopigian K, Viswanathan S, Robson AG. ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2021 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb;142(1):5-16. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs10633-020-09812-w. Epub 2021 Jan 25.",[],{"nct_id":4,"conditions":103,"biomarkers":105},[104],"Normal vision",[],{"nct_id":4,"found":15,"summary":17,"prompt_version":17}]