[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"trial:NCT06348394":3,"trial-entities:NCT06348394":115,"trial-summary:NCT06348394":119},{"id":4,"nct_id":4,"org_study_id":5,"brief_title":6,"official_title":6,"overall_status":7,"completion_date":8,"status_verified_date":9,"last_update_date":10,"start_date":11,"sponsor_name":12,"lead_sponsor_class":13,"has_dmc":14,"brief_summary":15,"detailed_description":16,"conditions":17,"keywords":19,"study_type":20,"primary_purpose":13,"phases":21,"enrollment_info":23,"interventions":26,"primary_outcomes":37,"secondary_outcomes":42,"sex":63,"minimum_age":64,"maximum_age":65,"healthy_volunteers":14,"eligibility_criteria":66,"std_ages":70,"locations":73,"central_contacts":96,"overall_officials":98,"references":99,"see_also_links":114},"NCT06348394","023-318","Intracardiac Versus Transesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion","RECRUITING","2030-12-30","2026-09","2026-09-03","2025-02-25","Baylor Research Institute","OTHER",false,"This single-center, prospective, randomized study will evaluate the safety and feasibility of Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) when compared to the traditional Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) approach.","The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of using Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) to guide implantation of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices.\n\nPrimary endpoints include procedural success following implantation of the left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device. Procedural success specifies that the device should be implanted in the correct position without device related complications and no peri-device leaks \\>5 mm on color doppler.\n\nSecondary end points include periprocedural complications (such as pericardial effusion\u002Ftamponade, stroke, death, vascular complications, and device embolization), procedural characteristics (total duration, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, Length of hospital stay), cost of hospitalization, in-hospital patient satisfaction, and clinical alterations at 45-day follow-up.",[18],"Left Atrial Appendage Closure",[],"INTERVENTIONAL",[22],"NA",{"count":24,"type":25},444,"ESTIMATED",[27,33],{"type":28,"name":29,"description":30,"armGroupLabels":31},"DEVICE","Intracardiac Echocardiography","Transesophageal echocardiography will be performed under general anesthesia.",[32],"Intracardiac echocardiography Left atrial appendage closure.",{"type":28,"name":34,"description":35,"armGroupLabels":36},"Traditional transesophageal echocardiography","Traditional transesophageal echocardiography guided Left atrial appendage closure",[35],[38],{"measure":39,"description":40,"timeFrame":41},"Procedural success following implantation of the left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device.","Procedural success specifies that the device should be implanted in the correct position measured as:\n\nPeri-device leaks greater than 5 milliliters on color doppler (Yes\u002FNo)","Intra op",[43,47,50,53,55,57,59,61],{"measure":44,"description":45,"timeFrame":46},"Periprocedural complications","Pericardial effusion\u002Ftamponade measured as (Yes\u002FNo)","45 days after the procedure",{"measure":48,"description":49,"timeFrame":46},"Procedural characteristics","Total duration measured as number of minutes.",{"measure":51,"description":52,"timeFrame":46},"Patient satisfaction","Patient satisfaction will be assessed in-hospital by a questionnaire addressing anesthesia-related discomfort.",{"measure":44,"description":54,"timeFrame":46},"Stroke measured as (Yes\u002FNo)",{"measure":44,"description":56,"timeFrame":46},"Death measured as (Yes\u002FNo)",{"measure":48,"description":58,"timeFrame":46},"Fluoroscopy time measured as number of minutes.",{"measure":48,"description":60,"timeFrame":46},"Contrast volume measured in milli liters.",{"measure":48,"description":62,"timeFrame":46},"Length of hospital stay measured as number of days.","ALL","18 Years","90 Years",{"inclusion":67,"exclusion":68,"raw_text":69},[],[],"Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Patients diagnosed for non-valvular atrial fibrillation with documented paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent NVAF.\n2. Deemed to be at high risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) defined as a CHADS2 score ≥2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3.\n3. Patient suitable for OAC with warfarin or DOAC and have appropriate rationale to seek a nonpharmacologic alternative to long-term OAC, meeting commercial LAAO criteria indications.\n4. Can undergo appropriate pre-procedural imaging with Computed tomography (CT) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).\n5. Patient should be able to comply with the protocol.\n6. Provide written informed consent before study participation.\n7. Ages 18 and above\n\nExclusion Criteria\n\n1\\) A patient will be ineligible for inclusion in this study if he or she meets any of the following criteria:\n\n1. Presence of an intracardiac thrombus on the preprocedural TEE or CT.\n2. History of previously implanted device for atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale.\n3. Severe LV dysfunction (LVEF \\\u003C 40%) or greater than moderate valvular heart disease.\n4. Enrollment in another study that competes or interferes with this study. Approval to dual enroll must be approved by the other study.\n5. Poor clinical condition like cardiogenic shock, which prohibits pre- and post-procedural function tests.\n6. Subject with planned cardiac intervention between the time of consenting and up to 60 days post-LAAO.\n7. Any other condition or co-morbidity which, in the opinion of the investigator or operator, may pose a significant hazard to the subject if he or she is enrolled in the study.\n8. For women of childbearing potential: Pregnant or breastfeeding women or planning pregnancy during the course of the investigation are excluded due to the risks involved in the procedure\n9. Children below 18 years, prisoners and patients who are unable to provide consent are excluded.",[71,72],"ADULT","OLDER_ADULT",[74],{"facility":75,"status":7,"city":76,"state":77,"zip":78,"country":79,"contacts":80,"geoPoint":93},"Baylor Scott and White Heart Hospital","Plano","Texas","75093","United States",[81,86,90],{"name":82,"role":83,"phone":84,"email":85},"Bonnie Ostergren","CONTACT","4698144181","Bonnie.Ostergren@BSWHealth.org",{"name":87,"role":83,"phone":88,"email":89},"Sarah Hale","4698144845","sarah.hale@bswhealth.org",{"name":91,"role":92},"Karim Al-Azizi, MD","PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"lat":94,"lon":95},33.01984,-96.69889,[97],{"name":82,"role":83,"phone":84,"email":85},[],[100,104,107,110],{"pmid":101,"type":102,"citation":103},"25399274","BACKGROUND","Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001\u002Fjama.2014.15192.",{"pmid":105,"type":102,"citation":106},"30827462","Hemam ME, Kuroki K, Schurmann PA, Dave AS, Rodriguez DA, Saenz LC, Reddy VY, Valderrabano M. Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device using intracardiac vs transesophageal echocardiography: Procedural and cost considerations. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Mar;16(3):334-342. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.hrthm.2018.12.013.",{"pmid":108,"type":102,"citation":109},"27540038","Tzikas A, Holmes DR Jr, Gafoor S, Ruiz CE, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Diener HC, Cappato R, Kar S, Lee RJ, Byrne RA, Ibrahim R, Lakkireddy D, Soliman OI, Nabauer M, Schneider S, Brachmann J, Saver JL, Tiemann K, Sievert H, Camm AJ, Lewalter T. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints, and data collection requirements for clinical studies. Europace. 2017 Jan;19(1):4-15. doi: 10.1093\u002Feuropace\u002Feuw141. Epub 2016 Aug 18.",{"pmid":111,"type":112,"citation":113},"40579293","DERIVED","Al-Azizi K, Thomas S, Hajar MBA, Pickering T, McCullough K, Dorton C, Moubarak G, Ma TW, Banwait J, Hale S, Gupta S, DiMaio JM, Szerlip M, Matar R, Aqtash O, Baig I, Trehan S, Potluri S. Intracardiac versus transesophageal echocardiographic guidance for left atrial appendage occlusion: Design and rationale of the ICE-TEE trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2026 Mar;84:82-87. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.carrev.2025.05.029. Epub 2025 Jun 1.",[],{"nct_id":4,"conditions":116,"biomarkers":118},[117],"Atrial Fibrillation",[],{"nct_id":4,"found":120,"summary":121,"prompt_version":130},true,{"design":122,"status":123,"heading":6,"summary":124,"follow_up":125,"word_count":126,"commitments":127,"compensation":128,"drugs_mentioned":129},"This is a single-center, prospective, randomized study comparing two guidance methods for LAAO, aiming to enroll 444 participants.","completed","This study is looking at two different ways to guide a procedure called Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO). LAAO is a procedure to close off a small pouch in the heart called the left atrial appendage, which can reduce the risk of stroke in people with a heart condition called non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The study compares using Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) to guide the procedure versus the more traditional Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) approach. You might be able to join if you are between 18 and 90 years old, have NVAF, and are at high risk for stroke, but need an alternative to long-term blood thinners. The study will consider the procedure successful if the LAAO device is placed correctly without major complications or leaks. The study aims to enroll 444 participants, but its current recruitment status is unclear.","Participants will have clinical alterations assessed at a 45-day follow-up.",138,"Not specified in the trial record.","Not stated in the trial record.",[29],"v2"]