[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"trial:NCT07285993":3,"trial-entities:NCT07285993":202,"trial-summary:NCT07285993":206},{"id":4,"nct_id":4,"org_study_id":5,"brief_title":6,"official_title":7,"overall_status":8,"completion_date":9,"status_verified_date":10,"last_update_date":11,"start_date":12,"sponsor_name":13,"lead_sponsor_class":14,"has_dmc":15,"brief_summary":16,"detailed_description":17,"conditions":18,"keywords":21,"study_type":27,"primary_purpose":28,"phases":29,"enrollment_info":31,"interventions":34,"primary_outcomes":50,"secondary_outcomes":55,"sex":77,"minimum_age":78,"maximum_age":17,"healthy_volunteers":79,"eligibility_criteria":80,"std_ages":93,"locations":96,"central_contacts":117,"overall_officials":122,"references":125,"see_also_links":201},"NCT07285993","STUDY-25-00364","Detection and Outcomes in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Through Novel F-18 FAP PET","Improving Detection and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Through Novel F-18 FAPI PET Imaging","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2027-12-30","2026-04","2026-05-01","2026-06-01","Randy Yeh","OTHER",true,"This study is a pilot clinical imaging trial of a prospective, head-to-head comparison of 18F-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI)-74 PET\u002FCT versus standard-of-care 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET\u002FCT in 15 patients with metastatic invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). Patients will undergo both 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT and 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT within a 2-week period (14 days + 7 days) to compare lesions, tumor detection rates, and PET lesion intensity, as well as to assess the clinical value of the PET scans from the treating physician's and the patient's perspective.",null,[19,20],"Breast Cancer","Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer",[19,22,23,24,25,26],"Novel F-18 FAPI PET","Metastatic","Invasive","Lobular","18F-FDG PET\u002FCT","INTERVENTIONAL","DIAGNOSTIC",[30],"PHASE2",{"count":32,"type":33},15,"ESTIMATED",[35,41,45],{"type":36,"name":37,"description":38,"armGroupLabels":39},"DRUG","18F-FAPI-74","FAPI scans will be performed as hybrid PET\u002FCT examinations for attenuation correction and lesion localization. Each patient will be injected intravenously with 7 mCi +\u002F- 2 mCi of 18F-FAPI-74 followed by a 20-minute (+\u002F-10 min) uptake period.",[40],"18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT and 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT",{"type":36,"name":42,"description":43,"armGroupLabels":44},"18F-FDG","FDG PET\u002FCT will be performed per standard-of-care protocol at Mount Sinai Hospital. Patients will fast for at least 6 hours before FDG administration and plasma glucose levels will be checked to ensure \\\u003C 200 mg\u002FdL. Each patient will be injected intravenously with 15 mCi +\u002F- 20% of 18F-FDG.",[40],{"type":46,"name":47,"description":48,"armGroupLabels":49},"PROCEDURE","PET\u002FCT","FAPI PET\u002FCT images will be acquired from the top of skull to mid-thigh. FDG PET\u002FCT images will be acquired from the skull base to mid-thigh after a 60-min uptake period. Outside FDG PET\u002FCT performed at another institutional can be accepted, if image quality and acquisition is comparable to standard-of-care protocol at Mount Sinai Hospital.",[40],[51],{"measure":52,"description":53,"timeFrame":54},"Proportion of lesions detected by 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT","Proportion of lesions detected by 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT but not by 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT. All lesions will be mapped across both imaging modalities to determine whether they were detected by FAPI PET\u002FCT but not by FDG PET\u002FCT.","End of study, at 1 month",[56,59,62,65,68,71,74],{"measure":57,"description":58,"timeFrame":54},"Proportion of lesions detected by 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT but not by 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT","All lesions will be mapped across both imaging modalities to determine whether they were detected by FDG PET\u002FCT but not by FAPI PET\u002FCT.",{"measure":60,"description":61,"timeFrame":54},"Proportion of concordant lesions detected by both 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT and 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT","All lesions will be mapped across both imaging modalities to determine whether they were detected by both FAPI PET\u002FCT and FDG PET\u002FCT (i.e., concordant detection).",{"measure":63,"description":64,"timeFrame":54},"Tumor detection rate","Tumor detection rate, defined as the proportion (%) of patients with \\>1 lesion on 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT compared to 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT",{"measure":66,"description":67,"timeFrame":54},"SUVmax of the hottest lesion (lesion with highest SUVmax) on 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT compared to 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT and mean SUVmax across all lesions","SUVmax of each lesion identified on both 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT and 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT.\n\nTwo summary metrics will be derived per patient per modality:\n\nHottest lesion SUVmax: Defined as the highest SUVmax value among all detected lesions per patient per modality.\n\nOverall SUVmax: model lesion-level SUVmax values",{"measure":69,"description":70,"timeFrame":54},"Tumor-to-background ratio (TBR)","Tumor-to-Background Ratio (TBR) will be defined as the SUVmax of the hottest lesion divided by the SUVmax of two background regions: the liver and the aortic blood pool.",{"measure":72,"description":73,"timeFrame":54},"Number of participants with change in therapeutic management decisions","Number of participants with change in therapeutic management decisions following review of 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT compared to decisions based on 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT alone\n\nFor each patient, an initial therapeutic management plan will be recorded based on findings from the 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT scan alone. After the subsequent review of the 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT scan, a revised management plan will be documented, reflecting any changes informed by the additional imaging data.",{"measure":75,"description":76,"timeFrame":54},"Change in disease status assessment","Change in disease status assessment (responding, stable, progressing) by treating physicians following review of 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT compared to assessment based on 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT alone Treating physicians will assign a disease status classification (responding, stable, or progressing) based on available clinical and imaging data from 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT and then after reviewing the 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT scan. We will summarize the distribution of disease status before and after the FAPI scan, along with the number and percentages of patients whose disease status assessment changed following the FAPI scan, along with the specific nature of those changes.","FEMALE","18 Years",false,{"inclusion":81,"exclusion":88,"raw_text":92},[82,83,84,85,86,87],"Provision of signed and dated informed consent form","Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and lifestyle considerations and availability for the duration of the study","Females; Age \\> 18 years of age","Diagnosis of invasive lobular breast cancer, with pathologically confirmed metastatic disease.","ECOG performance status 0-2","No planned change in anticancer therapy between FDG and FAPI PET scans",[89,90,91],"Patients who are pregnant or lactating","Patients who cannot undergo PET\u002FCT scanning","Patients with total serum bilirubin or serum creatinine \\> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Provision of signed and dated informed consent form\n* Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and lifestyle considerations and availability for the duration of the study\n* Females; Age \\> 18 years of age\n* Diagnosis of invasive lobular breast cancer, with pathologically confirmed metastatic disease.\n* ECOG performance status 0-2\n* No planned change in anticancer therapy between FDG and FAPI PET scans\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients who are pregnant or lactating\n* Patients who cannot undergo PET\u002FCT scanning\n* Patients with total serum bilirubin or serum creatinine \\> 1.5 times the upper limit of normal",[94,95],"ADULT","OLDER_ADULT",[97],{"facility":98,"city":99,"state":99,"zip":100,"country":101,"contacts":102,"geoPoint":114},"Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai","New York","10029","United States",[103,108,112],{"name":104,"role":105,"phone":106,"email":107},"Ilda Bander","CONTACT","(212) 241-0763","Ilda.Bander@mountsinai.org",{"name":109,"role":105,"phone":110,"email":111},"Rashmi Unawane","212-824-2385","Rashmi.Unawane@mssm.edu",{"name":13,"role":113},"PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR",{"lat":115,"lon":116},40.71427,-74.00597,[118,119],{"name":104,"role":105,"phone":106,"email":107},{"name":109,"role":105,"phone":120,"email":121},"(212) 824-2385","rashmi.unawane@mssm.edu",[123],{"name":124,"affiliation":98,"role":113},"Randy Yeh, MD",[126,130,133,136,139,142,145,148,151,154,157,160,163,166,169,172,175,178,181,184,187,190,193,195,198],{"pmid":127,"type":128,"citation":129},"28877238","BACKGROUND","Choi ES, Oh AY, In CB, Ryu JH, Jeon YT, Kim HG. Effects of recruitment manoeuvre on perioperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised single-blinded trial. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183311. doi: 10.1371\u002Fjournal.pone.0183311. eCollection 2017.",{"pmid":131,"type":128,"citation":132},"31912902","Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322\u002Fcaac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.",{"pmid":134,"type":128,"citation":135},"33293405","Fischer S, Dethlefsen S, Klockgether J, Tummler B. Phenotypic and Genomic Comparison of the Two Most Common ExoU-Positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clones, PA14 and ST235. mSystems. 2020 Dec 8;5(6):e01007-20. doi: 10.1128\u002FmSystems.01007-20.",{"pmid":137,"type":128,"citation":138},"36332363","Davis AA, Gerratana L, Clifton K, Medford AJ, Velimirovic M, Hensing WL, Bucheit L, Shah AN, D'Amico P, Reduzzi C, Zhang Q, Dai CS, Denault EN, Bagegni NA, Opyrchal M, Ademuyiwa FO, Bose R, Gradishar WJ, Behdad A, Ma CX, Bardia A, Cristofanilli M. Circulating tumour DNA characterisation of invasive lobular carcinoma in patients with metastatic breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2022 Dec;86:104316. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.ebiom.2022.104316. Epub 2022 Nov 1.",{"pmid":140,"type":128,"citation":141},"28537969","Dumans-Nizard V, Le Guen M, Sage E, Chazot T, Fischler M, Liu N. Thoracic Epidural Analgesia With Levobupivacaine Reduces Remifentanil and Propofol Consumption Evaluated by Closed-Loop Titration Guided by the Bispectral Index: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):635-642. doi: 10.1213\u002FANE.0000000000001996.",{"pmid":143,"type":128,"citation":144},"20079686","Benham-Hutchins MM, Effken JA. Multi-professional patterns and methods of communication during patient handoffs. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Apr;79(4):252-67. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.ijmedinf.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Jan 15.",{"pmid":146,"type":128,"citation":147},"21765193","Niikura N, Costelloe CM, Madewell JE, Hayashi N, Yu TK, Liu J, Palla SL, Tokuda Y, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. FDG-PET\u002FCT compared with conventional imaging in the detection of distant metastases of primary breast cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16(8):1111-9. doi: 10.1634\u002Ftheoncologist.2011-0089. Epub 2011 Jul 17.",{"pmid":149,"type":128,"citation":150},"25971426","Dashevsky BZ, Goldman DA, Parsons M, Gonen M, Corben AD, Jochelson MS, Hudis CA, Morrow M, Ulaner GA. Appearance of untreated bone metastases from breast cancer on FDG PET\u002FCT: importance of histologic subtype. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Oct;42(11):1666-1673. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00259-015-3080-z. Epub 2015 May 14.",{"pmid":152,"type":128,"citation":153},"26294295","Hogan MP, Goldman DA, Dashevsky B, Riedl CC, Gonen M, Osborne JR, Jochelson M, Hudis C, Morrow M, Ulaner GA. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2015 Nov;56(11):1674-80. doi: 10.2967\u002Fjnumed.115.161455. Epub 2015 Aug 20.",{"pmid":155,"type":128,"citation":156},"31791827","Broudic M, Bodet LM, Dumont R, Joram N, Jacqmarcq O, Caillon J, Flamant C, Thomas C, Tallet A, Piloquet H, Lepelletier D, Gras-Le Guen C, Launay E. A 1-year survey of catheter-related infections in a pediatric university hospital: A prospective study. Arch Pediatr. 2020 Feb;27(2):79-86. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.arcped.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 29.",{"pmid":158,"type":128,"citation":159},"26451490","Ciriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH, Wilkerson MD, Rhie SK, Pastore A, Zhang H, McLellan M, Yau C, Kandoth C, Bowlby R, Shen H, Hayat S, Fieldhouse R, Lester SC, Tse GM, Factor RE, Collins LC, Allison KH, Chen YY, Jensen K, Johnson NB, Oesterreich S, Mills GB, Cherniack AD, Robertson G, Benz C, Sander C, Laird PW, Hoadley KA, King TA; TCGA Research Network; Perou CM. Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer. Cell. 2015 Oct 8;163(2):506-19. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.cell.2015.09.033.",{"pmid":161,"type":128,"citation":162},"33830338","Singh M, Jonnalagadda S. Design and characterization of 3D printed, neomycin-eluting poly-L-lactide mats for wound-healing applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021 Apr 8;32(4):44. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs10856-021-06509-7.",{"pmid":164,"type":128,"citation":165},"2402505","Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ. Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7235-9. doi: 10.1073\u002Fpnas.87.18.7235.",{"pmid":167,"type":128,"citation":168},"30846472","Dwyer TJ, Daviskas E, Zainuldin R, Verschuer J, Eberl S, Bye PTP, Alison JA. Effects of exercise and airway clearance (positive expiratory pressure) on mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial. Eur Respir J. 2019 Apr 18;53(4):1801793. doi: 10.1183\u002F13993003.01793-2018. Print 2019 Apr.",{"pmid":170,"type":128,"citation":171},"34546478","Marchete R, Oliveira S, Bagne L, Silva JIS, Valverde AP, Aro AA, Figueira MM, Fronza M, Bressam TM, Goes VFF, Gaspari de Gaspi FO, Dos Santos GMT, Andrade TAM. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of Alternanthera brasiliana improve cutaneous wound healing in rats. Inflammopharmacology. 2021 Oct;29(5):1443-1458. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs10787-021-00862-3. Epub 2021 Sep 21.",{"pmid":173,"type":128,"citation":174},"26754644","Pase MP, Himali JJ, Mitchell GF, Beiser A, Maillard P, Tsao C, Larson MG, DeCarli C, Vasan RS, Seshadri S. Association of Aortic Stiffness With Cognition and Brain Aging in Young and Middle-Aged Adults: The Framingham Third Generation Cohort Study. Hypertension. 2016 Mar;67(3):513-9. doi: 10.1161\u002FHYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06610. Epub 2016 Jan 11.",{"pmid":176,"type":128,"citation":177},"27475955","Peavy GM, Edland SD, Toole BM, Hansen LA, Galasko DR, Mayo AM. Phenotypic differences based on staging of Alzheimer's neuropathology in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Oct;31:72-78. doi: 10.1016\u002Fj.parkreldis.2016.07.008. Epub 2016 Jul 21.",{"pmid":179,"type":128,"citation":180},"35584828","Ashworth I, Thielemans L, Chevassut T. Thrombocytopenia: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clin Med (Lond). 2022 May;22(3):214-217. doi: 10.7861\u002Fclinmed.2022-0146.",{"pmid":182,"type":128,"citation":183},"34854736","Yokohama T, Iwasaki M, Oura D, Furuya S, Niiya Y. Increased muscle fiber fractional anisotropy value using diffusion tensor imaging after compression without fiber injury. Acta Radiol. 2023 Jan;64(1):139-146. doi: 10.1177\u002F02841851211058282. Epub 2021 Dec 2.",{"pmid":185,"type":128,"citation":186},"36388249","Bremner P, Giuliani M. Impact of resolution, colour, and motion on object identification in digital twins from robot sensor data. Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 28;9:995342. doi: 10.3389\u002Ffrobt.2022.995342. eCollection 2022.",{"pmid":188,"type":128,"citation":189},"352072","[Vasilii Mikhailovich Banshchikov (on his 80th birthday)]. Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 1978;78(5):780-1. No abstract available. Russian.",{"pmid":191,"type":128,"citation":192},"12511721","Ishii H, Mukae H, Kadota J, Kaida H, Nagata T, Abe K, Matsukura S, Kohno S. High serum concentrations of surfactant protein A in usual interstitial pneumonia compared with non-specific interstitial pneumonia. Thorax. 2003 Jan;58(1):52-7. doi: 10.1136\u002Fthorax.58.1.52.",{"type":128,"citation":194},"LHutcheson JA, A Camden, D Charlevoix, T Cushing, M Jochelson, M Kruse, T Langdon, J Levin, C McKay, O Metzger, M Mitchell-Daniels, J Mouabbi, and B Neilsen. . Lobular Breast Cancer Alliance Inc. Survery of Individuals with Metastatatic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma [Poster]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.",{"pmid":196,"type":128,"citation":197},"34957527","Backhaus P, Gierse F, Burg MC, Buther F, Asmus I, Dorten P, Cufe J, Roll W, Neri D, Cazzamalli S, Millul J, Mock J, Galbiati A, Zana A, Schafers KP, Hermann S, Weckesser M, Tio J, Wagner S, Breyholz HJ, Schafers M. Translational imaging of the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) using the new ligand [68Ga]Ga-OncoFAP-DOTAGA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 May;49(6):1822-1832. doi: 10.1007\u002Fs00259-021-05653-0. Epub 2021 Dec 27.",{"pmid":199,"type":128,"citation":200},"3958116","Guyatt GH, Tugwell PX, Feeny DH, Drummond MF, Haynes RB. The role of before-after studies of therapeutic impact in the evaluation of diagnostic technologies. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(4):295-304. doi: 10.1016\u002F0021-9681(86)90051-2.",[],{"nct_id":4,"conditions":203,"biomarkers":205},[204],"Invasive Breast Lobular Carcinoma",[],{"nct_id":4,"found":15,"summary":207,"prompt_version":217},{"design":208,"status":209,"heading":210,"summary":211,"follow_up":212,"word_count":213,"commitments":214,"compensation":215,"drugs_mentioned":216},"This is a pilot imaging study comparing two different PET\u002FCT scans in 15 participants. It is a head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT versus 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT.","completed","Comparing F-18 FAPI PET\u002FCT to F-18 FDG PET\u002FCT for Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer","This study is comparing two types of PET\u002FCT scans, 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT and 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT, to see which one is better at finding tumors in people with metastatic invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC). You would receive both types of scans within a 2-week period. Researchers will compare how well each scan detects lesions and how intense the tumor signals are. They will also gather feedback from doctors and patients about the usefulness of each scan. This study is looking for 15 women, aged 18 or older, who have been diagnosed with metastatic invasive lobular breast cancer. The main goal is to see the proportion of lesions detected by the 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT scan by the end of the study, at 1 month.","The primary endpoint, proportion of lesions detected, is measured at the end of the study, at 1 month.",120,"You would undergo both an 18F-FDG PET\u002FCT and an 18F-FAPI-74 PET\u002FCT scan within a 2-week period. For the 18F-FDG scan, you would fast for at least 6 hours.","Not stated in the trial record.",[37,42,47],"v2"]