Study on Dry Needling for Knee Pain
This study is looking at how effective "dry needling" is for people with knee pain, specifically patellofemoral pain syndrome (pain around the kneecap). Dry needling uses very thin needles inserted into muscles to help them relax and reduce pain. The study will compare dry needling to a sham dry needling (where needles don't actually penetrate the skin) and standard physical therapy. Researchers want to see if dry needling improves pain and function. You might be able to join if you are 18-40 years old, have had knee pain for at least 3 months, and are referred for physical therapy. The study will measure changes in your knee pain and function after 3 weeks. The current status of this study is unclear.
- Study design
- This study is interventional and plans to enroll 120 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of five groups: gluteal dry needling, quadriceps dry needling, sham gluteal dry needling, sham quadriceps dry needling, or a control group receiving only physical therapy.
- What's involved
- You would receive an initial physical therapy (PT) evaluation and then 2 additional PT sessions a week apart. If in a dry needling or sham dry needling group, you would have 2 sessions of needling over 2 consecutive weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Measurements will be taken at the beginning of the study and again at week 3.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
The Effects of Dry Needling on Patients With Knee Pain
At a glance
Conditions
NCT02890485
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohiostudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Matthew S Briggs, DPT, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Ohio State University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change from Baseline Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) score to 3 weeksBaseline and Post testing (week 3)
The AKPS is commonly used to evaluate function in patients with PFPS. It is a 13-item questionnaire with a maximum score of 100. Higher scores are indicative of better function. The minimal detectable change (MDC) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the AKPS has been reported to be 10 and 13 points respectively and has high test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.81 to 0.95). The standard error of measurement is 3 and has been shown to be valid (0.92).
- Change from Baseline Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score to 3 weeksBaseline and Post testing (week 3)
Pain will be measured using the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Patients will be asked to rate their pain on 11-point (0-10) scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being extreme pain. The NPRS is a common measure of pain in patients with PFPS and has been shown to be reliable and responsive (minimal clinically important difference = 2 points).