Image Guided VATS vs. Standard VATS for Lung Cancer
This study is looking at two ways to remove small lung nodules (abnormal growths) in people with lung cancer. One method is standard Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS), which is a common surgical procedure. The other is Image Guided VATS resection, where a small marker (fiducial) is placed near the nodule to help guide the surgeon. The study aims to see how well each method works and how long the surgery takes. You might be able to join if you are 18 or older, your doctor thinks you are a good candidate for this type of surgery, and your lung nodule is small (2 cm or less) and located in the outer part of your lung. The study is currently unclear about its recruitment status.
- Study design
- This is a prospective phase II interventional study with 200 planned participants. It evaluates two surgical approaches for small pulmonary nodules.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary endpoint, Operating Room Time, will be measured at 3 years to complete.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Image Guided VATS vs. VATS Resection
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Raphael Bueno, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Brigham and Women's Hospital
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Operating Room Time3 years to complete
The time (in min.) from incision to close