Comparing Proton Therapy to Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
This study is comparing two types of radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: proton beam radiation therapy and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy. Proton therapy uses a beam of protons, while photon radiotherapy uses high-energy X-rays, both aiming to target the tumor while sparing healthy tissue. Researchers want to see if proton therapy improves overall survival and causes fewer serious heart and lung side effects compared to photon therapy. You may be eligible if you have Stage I-IVA esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. The study is also looking at how treatments affect your quality of life and symptoms. The current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 300 participants. It compares proton beam radiation therapy with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy.
- What's involved
- Participants will undergo blood sample collection, CT or PET/CT scans, and receive either Capecitabine, Carboplatin, or Docetaxel, along with one of the radiation therapies.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Overall survival will be measured until death or last follow-up, estimated to be 4 years after enrollment is complete. Adverse events will be monitored for up to 8 years.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Comparing Proton Therapy to Photon Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer
At a glance
Conditions
NCT03801876
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 96 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Alton Memorial Hospital
Alton, Illinoisno site contact published
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohiono site contact published
Corewell Health Beaumont Troy Hospital
Troy, Michiganno site contact published
Corewell Health Dearborn Hospital
Dearborn, Michiganno site contact published
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michiganno site contact published
Covenant Health Cancer Centers
Knoxville, Tennesseeno site contact published
Covenant Health Cancer Centers - West
Knoxville, Tennesseeno site contact published
Covenant Health Oncology Group - Maryville
Maryville, Tennesseeno site contact published
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Steven H Lin · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · NRG Oncology
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Overall survival (OS)From the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or date of last follow-up for patients without an OS event reported. This analysis occurs after 173 deaths; estimated to occur 4 years after accrual completion
Will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of OS between treatment arms will be compared using the log rank test.
- Incidence of specific grade 3+ cardiopulmonary adverse events (AEs) that are definitely, probably, or possibly related to protocol treatmentFrom baseline up to 8 years
Will be assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0. Difference in proportion of defined cardiopulmonary AEs will be analyzed with a chi-squared test.