Targeting Language and Executive Control in Logopenic Variant PPA
This study is looking into new ways to help people with Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (lvPPA), a type of dementia that mainly affects language. Researchers are testing if a treatment called High-definition active tDCS (transcranial direct current stimulation), which uses a mild electrical current on the brain, can improve language skills when combined with a "Repeat After Me" (RAM) therapy. They will compare this to a sham (inactive) tDCS with the same RAM therapy. The study aims to see if this combination improves your ability to repeat words and word sequences. To join, you should be 50-80 years old, right-handed, proficient in English, have a high school education, and have a diagnosis of PPA or a related dementia. The study is currently unclear about its recruitment status.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 60 participants. It compares active HD-tDCS with a "Repeat After Me" treatment to a sham (inactive) device with the same treatment.
- What's involved
- Participants will receive either active or sham electrical stimulation to the brain along with "Repeat After Me" therapy. Language skills will be tested before, immediately after, and then one and three months after the intervention.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your language skills will be checked at one month and three months after the intervention.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Targeting Language-specific and Executive-control Networks With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Logopenic Variant PPA
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Kyrana Tsapkini, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Johns Hopkins University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change in percent accuracy on word repetition (no delay) assessed by Temple Assessment of Language and Short-Term Memory in Aphasia (TALSA) Test 3Before intervention, immediately after intervention, 1 month post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The investigators will assess any changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment and 1- and 3- month follow-up intervals in percent accuracy on word repetition with no delay. This will be measured using the Temple Assessment of Language and Short-Term Memory (TALSA) Test 3: Word and Non-Word Repetition Test. The investigators will compute the raw score of items correct and transform to percent correct (range: 0-100%), computing change in outcome in percent difference as well as other arithmetic differences between percentage scores before intervention and each time point after. Increase in scores is considered a benefit. This outcome measure corresponds to Aim 1.
- Change in percent accuracy on word repetition (with 5-sec delay) assessed by TALSA Test 3Before intervention, immediately after intervention, 1 month post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The investigators will assess any changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment and 1- and 3- month follow-up intervals in percent accuracy on word repetition with delay (5-sec). This will be measured using the TALSA Test 3: Word and Non-Word Repetition Test. The investigators will compute the raw score of items correct and transform to percent correct (range: 0-100%), computing change in outcome in percent difference as well as other arithmetic differences between percentage scores before intervention and each time point after. Increase in scores is considered a benefit. This outcome measure corresponds to Aim 1.
- Change in percent accuracy on word span assessed by TALSA Test 14Before intervention, immediately after intervention, 1 month post intervention, 3 months post intervention
The investigators will assess any changes in performance from pre- to post-treatment and 1- and 3- month follow-up intervals in percent accuracy on word span. This will be measured using the TALSA Test 14: Word and Non-Word Repetition Span Test. The investigators will use the span calculation outlined in the TALSA. Span calculations consist of two numbers: the number of the last list length (LL) passed (e.g., 2 for pairs), and the proportion of correct strings out of the required strings to pass (5) of the next list. The highest spans obtainable for this test is 5.00. Increase in scores is considered a benefit. This outcome measure corresponds to Aim 1.