Phase 2 Study of MRI for Brain Metastasis After Radiation
This research study is looking at a special way to use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain. The goal is to tell the difference between a brain tumor that has grown back and changes caused by radiation treatment, after a brain metastasis (cancer that has spread to the brain) has been treated with focused radiation. This study is for adults aged 18 and older who have a solid cancer that started outside the brain and has spread to the brain, and who have already received focused radiation for it. The researchers want to see how well this special MRI technique, called Treatment Response Assessment Maps (TRAMs), can accurately identify tumor recurrence. The study is currently unclear on its recruitment status and plans to enroll 101 participants.
- Study design
- This is a Phase II interventional study. It is designed to enroll 101 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary endpoint, sensitivity, is measured within 3 months of study enrollment.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Treatment Response Assessment Maps to Delineate Necrosis From Tumor After Stereotactic Radiation in Brain Metastases
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
2 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Ayal Aizer, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Brigham and Women's Hospital
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- SensitivityWithin 3 months of study enrollment
The sensitivity along with 95% exact binomial confidence interval of pre-operative treatment response assessment maps for the identification of viable tumor relative to the gold standard of pathologic review