Pilot Study of a Microdevice for Drug Screening in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma
This study is testing a new microdevice designed to help doctors find the most effective treatments for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) that affects the skin. The microdevice, which is implanted directly into a cancerous skin lesion, can release up to 19 different drugs, including romidepsin, vorinostat, bexarotene, brentuximab vedotin, pralatrexate, and mogamulizumab. Researchers want to see if the microdevice can be safely inserted and removed, and if it can collect enough tissue to analyze. This is a pilot study, meaning it's the first time this device is being tested in patients. You may be able to join if you are an adult with a confirmed diagnosis of CTCL or PTCL with skin involvement and have measurable skin lesions. The study aims to enroll 20 participants, but its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a pilot and feasibility study, meaning it's the first time this microdevice is being tested in patients. It plans to enroll 20 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for up to 2 years after the microdevice is placed and removed.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
A Pilot of a Microdevice For In Situ Candidate Drug Screening in Cutaneous Lesions of T-Cell Lymphoma
At a glance
Conditions
NCT04045470
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusettsstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Cecilia Larocca, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- To Quantify The Number Of Microdevice-Related Failures Or Adverse Events As Assessed By CTCAE v4.0 After Microdevice Placement and Removal2 years
"Failure" will be considered any of the following: 1. Any grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with device placement or retrieval 2. Any device resulting in "major" adverse events as listed below: * device unable to be found or unable to be retrieved * device invading into vessel or device embolism * infection or severe tissue damage or abnormal wound healing associated with device or procedure (as deemed by a neutral consultant e.g. dermatologist, ID specialist or surgeon) * severe allergic/hypersensitivity reaction * severe bleeding 3. Any device resulting in \*two or more\* "minor" adverse events as listed below: * device migration more than 10 mm * device fracture not causing a major adverse event * mild allergic/hypersensitivity reaction * manageable pain associated with biopsy procedure * minor bleeding For purposes of this endpoint, safety will be evaluated on a per-patient level, where an event is defined as any "failure" observed among all implanted devices.
- To Retrieve The Device With Sufficient Tissue Of Sufficient Quality2 years
For the feasibility endpoint, a "successful" procedure will be defined as the ability to retrieve the device (by either skin punch biopsy tool or surgical excision) without damaging tumor tissue surrounding the microdevice to allow for immunohistochemistry analysis. For purposes of this endpoint, feasibility will be assessed on a per-device basis rather than a per-patient basis, with each device considered relatively independent in terms of placement, retrieval, and analysis.