Improving Cognitive Function in Older Adults After Stem Cell Transplant
This study is looking at whether a physical activity program called CHAMPS-II can help improve thinking and memory skills in older adults who have recently had a stem cell transplant (HCT) for blood cancers like leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma. Many older adults who undergo HCT can experience problems with their memory and thinking. CHAMPS-II is a personalized program that gives you information, training, and support to help you be more physically active. Researchers believe that increasing physical activity might help improve these cognitive (thinking) abilities. The study aims to enroll 108 participants and is currently unclear about its recruitment status. Success in this study will be measured by changes in specific tests of executive function (a set of mental skills that include working memory, flexible thinking, and self-control) at 12 weeks.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study, meaning participants will receive a specific intervention. It plans to enroll 108 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants' executive function will be measured at 12 weeks after starting the intervention.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Improving Cognitive Function in Older Adults Undergoing Stem Cell Transplant
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Thuy Koll, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Nebraska
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change in executive function as measured by Trails A.12 weeks
Change in raw scores and z-scores, determined by the following neuropsychological test: Trail Making Test Part A (Trails A). Time to complete and number of errors are measured, where less time and errors are better outcomes.
- Change in executive function as measured by Trails B.12 weeks
Change in raw scores and z-scores, determined by the following neuropsychological tests: Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B). Time to complete and number of errors are measured, where less time and errors are better outcomes.
- Change in executive function as measured by the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT).12 weeks
Change in raw scores and z-scores, determined by the following neuropsychological test: Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT). Minimum score is zero and maximum is unlimited; higher score means better outcome.
- Change in working memory as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R).12 weeks
Change in raw scores and z-scores, determined by the following neuropsychological test: Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R). There are 3 learning trials and 1 delayed recall trial. Minimum score for each is zero and maximum is 12; higher score means better outcome. There is also a delayed recognition trial where person is presented with both true positives and false positives. Minimum score for both is zero and maximum is 12. For the true positives a higher score means better outcome. For the false positives a lower score means better outcome.