Expert Consensus Guidelines for Cancer Care
This study aims to create a shared agreement among cancer experts on what important information should be included in electronic health records for prostate cancer patients. This will help standardize how patient data is reported from diagnosis through treatment and into survivorship. The study involves experts completing questionnaires remotely. The goal is to improve how cancer patients are managed by making sure key information is consistently recorded. This study is for board-certified medical professionals who treat prostate cancer patients and are at least 21 years old.
- Study design
- This is an observational study involving 10 participants. It uses a Delphi technique, which means experts will complete multiple rounds of questionnaires.
- What's involved
- Participants will complete 3-4 rounds of questionnaires, each taking 20-30 minutes, over a period of 2 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary goal is measured through study completion, which is an average of a year.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Formulating Expert Consensus Guidelines in Cancer Care Using the Delphi Method
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Amy C Moreno · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- To establish a standardized methods to report key data in electronic health records to better manage cancer patients at time of diagnosis, treatment, follow up, and into survivor-ship.through study completion, an average of a year.