Improving Adolescent and Young Adult Self-Reported Data in Cancer Trials
This study aims to find the best way for young people (ages 18-39) with cancer to share information about their health and well-being. It compares two approaches: one where you choose which health topics to report on (Choice PRO) and another where you report on a fixed set of topics (Fixed PRO). Researchers want to see if it's practical and acceptable for young adults to complete these health questionnaires. To join, you must be 18-39 years old with a recently diagnosed cancer and be receiving or planning to receive cancer treatment. The study will be considered successful if at least 75% of the questionnaires are completed and found acceptable by participants. The current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a randomized controlled trial comparing two ways of collecting health information from participants, with a planned enrollment of 400 individuals.
- What's involved
- You would complete questionnaires online at the start of the study, and then again at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be assessed for up to 12 months after starting the study.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Improving Adolescent and Young Adult Self-Reported Data in ECOG-ACRIN Trials
At a glance
Conditions
NCT05108298
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 347 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesotano site contact published
Adena Regional Medical Center
Chillicothe, Ohiono site contact published
AdventHealth Littleton
Littleton, Coloradono site contact published
AdventHealth Parker
Parker, Coloradono site contact published
AdventHealth Porter
Denver, Coloradono site contact published
Alegent Health Bergan Mercy Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraskano site contact published
Alegent Health Immanuel Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraskano site contact published
Alegent Health Lakeside Hospital
Omaha, Nebraskano site contact published
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- John M Salsman · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
What this trial measures
- Feasibility of completing patient reported outcomes (PROs)At 1 month
Will be defined as \>= 75% completed PROs at one-month. Feasibility will be compared between two arms using the two-sample proportion tests based on two binomial distributions. Fisher's exact method will be used to calculate the p value. Potential moderators will include sociodemographic information (i.e., Protocol for Responding to \& Assessing Patients' Assets, Risks \& Experiences \[PRAPARE\] form, geocoding, etc.), health literacy, adherence boosters (reminder calls, text messages), cancer type, treatment plan, and location of care (inpatient hospital or outpatient clinic setting). Their effects will be evaluated using the logistic regression method with feasibility modeled as the binary response.
- Acceptability of completing PROsBaseline
Will be defined as \>= 75% completed PROs at baseline. Acceptability will be compared between two arms using the two-sample proportion tests based on two binomial distributions. Fisher's exact method will be used to calculate the p value. Potential moderators will include sociodemographic information (i.e., PRAPARE form, geocoding, etc.), health literacy, adherence boosters (reminder calls, text messages), cancer type, treatment plan, and location of care (inpatient hospital or outpatient clinic setting). Their effects will be evaluated using the logistic regression method with acceptability modeled as the binary response.