The CONFORM Pivotal Trial for Atrial Fibrillation

This study is evaluating a new device called CLAAS for people with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) who are at high risk of stroke. The goal is to see if the CLAAS device is as safe and effective as two currently available devices, WATCHMAN and Amulet, in preventing strokes. You might be able to join if you are 18 or older, have non-valvular atrial fibrillation, a high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or higher), and your doctor believes a non-medication option is best for you. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the CLAAS device or one of the other two devices. The study will look at complications, death, and major bleeding at 12 months, and strokes and blood clots at 18 months. The study status is currently unclear.

Study design
This is an interventional study planning to enroll 1600 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the study devices.
What's involved
Participants will receive a device implant and be followed for 5 years after the implant.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Participants will be followed for 5 years after the device implant. Primary outcomes are measured at 12 and 18 months.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT05147792

The CONFORM Pivotal Trial

Suspended
NAAges 18+InterventionalPrevention
Conformal Medical, Inc
~1,600 participants
Updated 2026-08-19 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:CLAASWATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device / Amulet left atrial appendage occluder

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 93 listed sites are recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Procedure-related complications, all-cause death, major bleeding
Measured over 12 months
+1 more outcome measured
Atrial Fibrillation
Stroke

NCT05147792

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 93 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Abrazo Arizona Heart Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizonano site contact published

  • AdventHealth Orlando

    Orlando, Floridano site contact published

  • AdventHealth Tampa

    Tampa, Floridano site contact published

  • AKFA Medline

    Olmazor, Tashkent, Uzbekistanno site contact published

  • Albany Medical Center / Capital Cardiology Associates

    Albany, New Yorkno site contact published

  • Arizona Heart Arrhythmia Associates

    Phoenix, Arizonano site contact published

  • Ascension St. Vincent - Carmel, IN

    Indianapolis, Indianano site contact published

  • Ascension St. Vincent's Jacksonville

    Jacksonville, Floridano site contact published

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

  • William Gray, M.D. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Lankenau Heart Institute
  • Shephal Doshi, M.D. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Pacific Heart Institute

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

  • Procedure-related complications, all-cause death, major bleeding12 months

    The primary safety endpoint is a composite of 1) major procedure-related complications including a) cardiac perforation, b) pericardial effusion requiring drainage, c) ischemic stroke, d) device embolization, and e) major vascular complications, or 2) major bleeding, or 3) all-cause death

  • Ischemic stroke and systemic embolism18 months

    The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism through 18 months.