Study on Improving Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk
This study is looking at new ways to help families understand and get genetic testing for cancer risk. It focuses on two main interventions: the "Intervention Arm At-risk Relative/ARR Contacts" and the "MyGene Portal." The first intervention involves healthcare providers reaching out to family members who might share a cancer-related gene mutation (like BRCA1 or BRCA2) to offer genetic testing. The MyGene Portal is an online tool where you can access your genetic test results, personalized medical advice, and educational materials. The study aims to see how these approaches affect how many people get tested and their overall experience with care. To join, you need to be at least 25 years old, an MSK patient, and have had genetic counseling recently. You also need to speak English or Spanish very well and have at least one at-risk family member.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 1000 participants. It compares different ways of offering genetic testing to family members.
- What's involved
- Participants will either provide contact information for at-risk relatives or use the MyGene Portal to access their genetic information and updates. Standard medical care will also be provided.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study will compare genetic testing uptake and participant-perceived quality of care at 12 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
An Intervention to Increase Genetic Testing in Families Who May Share a Gene Mutation Related to Cancer Risk and An Intervention to Help Patients and Their Primary Care Providers Stay Up-to-date About Uncertain Genetic Test Results
At a glance
Conditions
NCT05420064
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 8 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Basking Ridge (Limited Protocol Activities)
Basking Ridge, New Jerseystudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Limited Protocol Activity)
Montvale, New Jerseystudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New Yorkstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth (Limited Protocol Activities)
Middletown, New Jerseystudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau (Limited Protocol Activity)
Uniondale, New Yorkstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Suffolk - Commack (Limited Protocol Activities)
Commack, New Yorkstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester (Limited Protocol Activities)
Harrison, New Yorkstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
MSK at Ralph Lauren (Limited Protocol Activities)
New York, New Yorkstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Kenneth Offit, MD, MPH · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Comparison of genetic testing uptake in provider-facilitated cascade testing intervention to the proband-mediated cascade testing control12 months
The Primary Objective for EfFORT Trial: Assess genetic testing uptake by first-, second-, and third-degree relatives in the provider-facilitated cascade testing intervention as compared to the proband-mediated cascade testing control.
- Comparison of participant perceived quality of care12 months
The Primary Objective for STRIVE Trial: Assess perceived quality of Variant of uncertain significance/VUS follow-up care and continued engagement with the Clinical Genetics Service/CGS care team in the digitally-facilitated VUS follow-up intervention as compared to the patient-led VUS follow-up control. A modified subset of items based upon an existing survey of patient-centered quality of follow-up care for cancer survivors (Cronbach's α=0.65-0.93) will be used to measure patient perceptions of the quality of their follow-up care provided by both the CGS care team (11 items) and their PCPs (6 items). Items are measured on a 4-point Likert-type scale, and mean scores are computed such that higher scores indicate greater perceived quality of care This measure will be collected from VUS patient participants in both study arms and a mean score calculated across items.