Valve Optimization for ViV TAVR
This study is looking at the best way to optimize a new heart valve after a procedure called valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (ViV TAVR). ViV TAVR is when a new valve is placed inside an old, failing surgical heart valve. Researchers are comparing two methods to guide this optimization: using Doppler-echocardiography (a type of ultrasound) or using invasive hemodynamic measurements (measurements taken directly inside the heart with a catheter). You may be able to join if you have a failing surgical aortic valve (Aortic Valve Stenosis or Aortic Valve Regurgitation) that is approved for a ViV TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve. The study aims to see how these different optimization methods affect your quality of life and any complications during the procedure. The study plans to enroll 310 participants.
- Study design
- This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded study. It will include 310 participants.
- What's involved
- You would undergo a ViV TAVR procedure with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with further interventions based on either Doppler-echocardiography or invasive hemodynamic measurements.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your quality of life will be measured at 12 months after the procedure, and periprocedural complications will be measured around the time of the procedure.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Valve Hemodynamic Optimization Based on Doppler-Echocardiography vs Catheterization Measurements Following ViV TAVR
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
7 sites across 7 statesStudy leadership
- Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Changes in Quality of life (Efficacy)12 months follow-up
Change in quality of life as evaluated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). All score are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale (lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life).The KCCQ is a 7 domains questionnaire; symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy.
- Periprocedural complications (Safety)Periprocedural
Periprocedural complications including in-hospital mortality, stroke, annular rupture, coronary obstruction, new-onset left bundle branch block, need for permanent pacemaker implantation and conversion to open heart surgery.