Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training for Spinal Cord Injuries
This study is looking into how transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (a non-invasive way to stimulate the spinal cord) combined with activity-based training (motor tasks) might help improve movement in people with spinal cord injuries. Researchers want to understand how these treatments affect the signals between your brain and spinal cord, both in the short term and over time. The goal is to learn more about how these treatments work so that better therapies can be developed. This study is currently recruiting healthy volunteers between 16 and 65 years old who do not have any major health problems or chronic pain. Success will be measured by changes in how your nerves respond to stimulation and how quickly you react to certain cues over a 4-week period.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 120 participants. It is not specified if it is a randomized or blinded study.
- What's involved
- Participants will undergo electrophysiology assessments (tests of nerve activity) and engage in activity-based training and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. These assessments will occur before and after interventions, and at 4 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for 4 weeks after the interventions.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Ismael Seanez, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Washington University School of Medicine
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Motor evoked potentials amplitude and latency30 minutes before and 30 minutes after intervention; 4 weeks
This primary outcome is a measure of changes in corticospinal tract excitability and plasticity as quantified by changes in the amplitude size and onset latency of motor evoked potentials elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation.
- Reaction time to startle response30 minutes before and 30 minutes after intervention; 4 weeks
This primary outcome is a measure of changes in reticulospinal tract excitability after training as quantified by changes in reaction time after a startling auditory stimulus.
- F-wave response persistence30 minutes before and 30 minutes after intervention; 4 weeks
This primary outcome is a measure of changes in spinal motoneuron excitability as quantified by changes in the persistence of F-wave responses elicited via peripheral nerve stimulation.