Peer Navigation for Metastatic Prostate Cancer Genetic Evaluation
This study is looking at whether a trained peer navigator can help African American men with metastatic prostate cancer (cancer that has spread) better understand and go through genetic testing. Genetic testing is important for making treatment decisions. The study compares receiving help from a peer navigator with receiving standard care. Researchers want to see if peer navigation increases how often men engage with genetic counseling. You may be able to join if you are an African American man, 18 or older, speak English, and have metastatic prostate cancer.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with 120 planned participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive peer navigation services or standard care.
- What's involved
- If you join, you will either receive assistance from a peer navigator or standard care during your genetic evaluation process. This includes genetic counseling, genetic testing, and receiving your results.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study will measure engagement with genetic counseling for up to 4 years.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Peer Navigation for the Support of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Genetic Evaluation
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Amy Leader, DrPH, MPH · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Thomas Jefferson University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
What this trial measures
- Frequency of pretest genetic counseling engagementUp to 4 years
Compared between randomized study groups. Tested using a chi-square test. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time.