Support for Families of Critically Ill Patients
This study is testing two ways to help family members who are making difficult decisions for critically ill loved ones in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). These family members, called surrogates, often experience significant grief and stress. The study compares a program called EMPOWER, which uses techniques from cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy, with a Supportive Conversation. EMPOWER involves breathing exercises, mindfulness, and talking about the patient. The Supportive Conversation offers similar time and attention. The goal is to see if EMPOWER can reduce symptoms of prolonged grief, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and anticipatory grief over 12 months, compared to the Supportive Conversation. This study is for adults aged 18 and older who are surrogate decision-makers for patients near the end of life in the ICU.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 172 participants. It compares two different interventions: EMPOWER and Supportive Conversation.
- What's involved
- The EMPOWER intervention and the Supportive Conversation will each last about 1.5-2 hours, with two additional follow-up calls.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed from the start of the study through twelve-month follow-up.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
3 sites across 2 statesStudy leadership
- Holly Prigerson, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Wendy Lichtenthal, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Miami
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change of Prolonged Grief Disorderfrom baseline through twelve-month follow-up
Symptoms of prolonged grief disorder, as measured by the Prolonged Grief-13-Revised, will be compared between the week following the intervention, at one month follow-up and at twelve-month follow-up . The PG-13-R consists of 13 items and total score can range from 0 to 62. Higher total scores represent greater symptom burden. Lower scores represent better outcomes.
- Change of Post-Traumatic Stress DisorderFrom baseline through twelve-month follow-up
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, as measured by the Impact of Events Scale-Revised, will be compared between groups at baseline through twelve-month follow up assessments . The IES-R consists of 22 items and total score can range from 0 to 88. Higher total scores represent greater symptom burden. Lower scores represent better outcomes.
- Change of Anticipatory Grieffrom baseline through twelve-month follow-up
Symptoms of anticipatory grief, as measured by the PG-12-R, consists of 12 items using a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 11 to 55, with higher scores representing greater anticipatory grief.