Study of Chemotherapy with or without Nivolumab for Advanced Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Gastric Adenocarcinoma
This study is comparing two chemotherapy combinations, mFOLFIRINOX and mFOLFOX, with or without the immunotherapy drug nivolumab, for advanced, unresectable (cannot be surgically removed), or metastatic (spread to other parts of the body) HER2-negative esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinoma. The study aims to see if mFOLFIRINOX, with or without nivolumab, improves how long people live compared to mFOLFOX, with or without nivolumab. You may be eligible if you are 18 or older, have HER2-negative adenocarcinoma, and your tumor's PD-L1 status is known. The study plans to enroll 382 participants.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study that will randomize participants into different treatment groups. It plans to enroll 382 participants.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your overall survival will be measured for up to 2 years from the time you are assigned to a treatment group.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
mFOLFIRINOX Versus mFOLFOX With or Without Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic HER2 Negative Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Gastric Adenocarcinoma
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
793 sites across 48 statesWho to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Overall survival (OS)Up to 2 years from the time of randomization.
Will compare the distributions of OS between the two treatment arms to determine if patients treated with modified fluorouracil, leucovorin calcium, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFIRINOX) (with or without nivolumab) have an OS benefit compared to those treated with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (with or without nivolumab). Kaplan-Meier methodology will be used to estimate the distributions for the treatment arms. To compare the OS distributions between the two treatment arms, we will use a one-sided logrank test to evaluate if mFOLFIRINOX (with or without nivolumab) is superior to mFOLFOX (with or without nivolumab) based on an intention to treat analysis. The hazard ratio, median OS, and estimated OS rates at 1 and 2 years will be estimated along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models will also be used to assess the impact of treatment arm on OS when stratifying on the stratification factors.