3D-Printed Versus Laboratory-Fabricated Hyrax Expanders for Maxillary Expansion
This study is comparing two types of devices used to expand the upper jaw (maxillary expanders) in children aged 8 to 13. One type, the 3D-Printed Hyrax Expander, is designed on a computer and made with a 3D printer. The other, the Conventional Laboratory Fabricated Hyrax Expander, is made by hand. Both are already used at the MUSC Orthodontics Clinic. The goal is to see if the 3D-printed expander works as well as the traditional one and is more comfortable. We will measure how much the upper jaw opens after 2 weeks. The study is looking for 42 participants and its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This study is comparing two different types of maxillary expanders. It plans to enroll 42 children between 8 and 13 years old.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary measurement of jaw opening will be taken at 2 weeks.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
3D-Printed Versus Laboratory-Fabricated Hyrax Expanders
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
2 sites across 2 statesStudy leadership
- Ildeu Andrade, DDS, MS, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Pittsburgh
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Dimension of the Anterior Midpalatal Suture Opening2 weeks
The dimension of the anterior midpalatal suture opening between the maxillary halves will be measured digitally in millimeters on the occlusal radiograph using a calibrated ruler.