Back to search results
NCT05770479

Assessing and Improving the Durability of Compensatory Cognitive Training for Older Veterans

Enrolling by Invitation
NAAges 55+Interventional
VA Office of Research and Development
~28 participants
Updated 2025-08-13 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Motivationally-Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training (ME-CCT) Booster ModulesTreatment As Usual

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
"Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)" questionnaire mean score
Measured over 4 weeks
+2 more outcomes measured

Conditions

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Explore related trials

Mild cognitive disorder

Where it's being run

1 sites across 1 states
California1

Study leadership

  • Jacqueline E Maye, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Who to contact

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Veterans aged 55 and older who are able to provide informed consent
Previous completion of the "Cognitive Rehabilitation for Older Veterans with Mild Cognitive Impairment" \[PI: Twamley, VA CSRD: I01CX001592\] study and received the ME-CCT intervention
Independently living
English-speaking: this is necessary to complete cognitive and functional testing and participate in booster development and other study procedures

Exclusion

Participation in sub-study 2 of this CDA, in which study participants assist with the design of booster intervention modules
DSM-5 criteria for current substance use disorder and has been substance abstinent for less than 30 days
History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other primary psychotic disorder
History of significant brain injury with loss of consciousness \>30 minutes
Auditory or visual impairments that would prevent ability to participate in booster sessions or ability to benefit from compensatory strategies

What this trial measures

  • "Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)" questionnaire mean score4 weeks

    Four-item measure of perceived intervention implementation acceptability from Weiner et al., (2017) that has demonstrated strong psychometric properties. On a scale of 1-5 (completely disagree to completely agree), participants are asked to respond to the following: 1) implementation strategy meets my approval 2) implementation strategy is appealing to me 3) I like the implementation strategy 4) I welcome the implementation strategy. Average score of these four questions is calculated for measure score. Mean of participants' measure scores will be reported.

  • "Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)" questionnaire mean score4 weeks

    Four-item measure of perceived intervention implementation appropriateness from Weiner et al., (2017) that has demonstrated strong psychometric properties. On a scale of 1-5 (completely disagree to completely agree), participants are asked to respond to the following: 1) implementation strategy seems fitting 2) implementation strategy seems suitable 3) implementation strategy seems applicable 4) implementation strategy seems like a good match. Average score of these four questions is calculated for measure score. Mean of participants' measure scores will be reported.

  • "Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)" questionnaire mean score4 weeks

    Four-item measure of perceived intervention implementation feasibility from Weiner et al., (2017) that has demonstrated strong psychometric properties. On a scale of 1-5 (completely disagree to completely agree), participants are asked to respond to the following: 1) implementation strategy seems implementable 2) implementation strategy seems possible 3) implementation strategy seems doable 4) implementation strategy seems easy to use. Average score of these four questions is calculated for measure score. Mean of participants' measure scores will be reported.