SCENT for Long COVID: Smell Dysfunction Study
This study is for people experiencing ongoing smell loss or changes (like diminished, distorted, or absent smell) due to Long COVID. It's testing two at-home treatments: Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS), which uses gentle electrical stimulation on the forehead to improve smell, and Active Smell Training, which involves sniffing various strong scents and doing smell-related tasks. A comparison group will do Placebo Smell Training with weaker scents. The study aims to see how well these treatments improve your sense of smell and how you perceive odors after 4 and 12 weeks. You can join if you are 18-65, have had COVID-related smell loss for at least one month, had a normal sense of smell before COVID, and haven't tried these treatments before. The study status is currently unclear.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study planning to enroll 145 participants. It compares two active treatments (Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation and Active Smell Training) to a placebo smell training.
- What's involved
- You will conduct daily at-home treatment sessions, attend three in-person study visits at MUSC, and complete electronic questionnaires over 12 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your smell function will be measured at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and again at six months after the start of the trial.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Study of Chemosensory Enhancement Through Neuromodulation Training (SCENT for Long COVID)
At a glance
Conditions
NCT05855369
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Change in Psychophysical Olfactory Function from Baseline to 4 and 12 Weeks2 times: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Sniffin' Sticks (Bughardt Messtechnik, Wedel Germany) will be used to determine odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I), each on 16-point scales, and summed for a total TDI score. Higher scores indicate better function.
- Change in Perceived Intensity of Odorants from Baseline to 4 and 12 Weeks2 times: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Perceived intensity on 100-mm visual analog scales with anchor points: 0="imperceptible" to 100="extremely intense" will be rated for suprathreshold concentrations of PEA, vanilla, eugenol, and eucalyptus.
- Change in Perceived Hedonics of Odorants from Baseline to 4 and 12 Weeks2 times: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Perceived hedonics on 100-mm visual analog scales with anchor points: 0="extremely unpleasant" to 100="extremely pleasant".
- Change in Olfactory-related Quality of Life from Baseline to 4 and 12 Weeks2 times: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
The Modified Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) consists of 17 negative statements (rated on a scale from 0 to 3; total score ranging from 0 to 51), with lower scores indicating better olfactory-related quality of life.
- Change in Impact of Olfactory Loss from Baseline to 4 and 12 Weeks2 times: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
The Impact of Olfactory Loss Visual Analog Scale (IOL-VAS) consists of 9 separate items assessing the impact of olfactory loss upon mood, food enjoyment, social interactions, safety, hygiene, sex, cooking, appetite, and weight changes, rated from 0 (no impact) to 10 (biggest impact possible).