HFNC vs NIPPV Following Extubation in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease
This study is comparing two ways to help infants breathe after heart surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD). After surgery, babies are often on a breathing machine (intubated) and then taken off (extubated). This study wants to find out if High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) or Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) is better at preventing breathing problems after extubation. Researchers will look at how well each method works to avoid needing the breathing tube again within two weeks after surgery. You might be able to join if you are an infant up to 1 year old or weighing up to 10 kg, admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit after heart surgery for CHD.
- Study design
- This study will involve 200 participants who will be randomly assigned to receive either High Flow Nasal Cannula or Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation.
- What's involved
- Participants will receive either High Flow Nasal Cannula or Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation following extubation, with clinical monitoring and respiratory support adjusted as needed.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary outcome of avoiding extubation failures will be measured up to 2 weeks after surgery.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
HFNC vs NIPPV Following Extubation
At a glance
Conditions
NCT05869825
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Arthur M. Blank Hospital | Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgiano site contact published
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Asaad Beshish, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Emory University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- To compare the effectiveness in avoiding extubation failures of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) vs Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)After surgery up to 2 weeks
Rates of extubation failures (EF) will be compared among both groups. Data will be collected from the hospital electronic medical record system.