Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App for Anxiety and Depression

This study is looking at how well a new mobile app, called the Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App, works for pregnant and postpartum individuals who are experiencing anxiety or depression. The app teaches skills based on cognitive behavioral therapy (a type of talk therapy) to help manage mood and anxiety. Researchers want to see if the app is easy to use and helpful for people. You might be able to join if you are pregnant or up to 12 months postpartum, are 18 or older, speak English, and have a smartphone. The study will consider it a success if participants find the app's content helpful and its design acceptable. The current recruitment status is unclear.

Study design
This is an interventional study planning to enroll 75 participants. It is not specified if it is randomized or blinded.
What's involved
Participants will complete a 12-module app over approximately 6 weeks. They will also complete app feedback questionnaires, feedback interviews, a daily symptom tracker, and symptom measures.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Participants will be followed for about 12 weeks after starting the app.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT05897619

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Cognitive Behavioral Skills Mobile App for Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals

Recruiting
NAAges 18+InterventionalTreatment
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
~75 participants
Updated 2026-02-27 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Experimental: Maya Perinatal Cognitive Behavioral Skills App

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at midpoint
Measured over Midpoint (approximately 3 weeks)
+17 more outcomes measured
Perinatal Anxiety
Perinatal Depression
1 sites across 1 states
New York1
  • Andrea Temkin-Yu, Psy.D. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Female, Trans-male, non-binary, gender expansive, or gender questioning gestational carriers of pregnancy
Currently pregnant or up to 12 months postpartum
18 years or older
English proficiency
Have access to a smartphone or other mobile device capable of receiving Short Message Service (SMS) pushes and complete Qualtrics surveys and App modules
Be available to speak by phone or secure video-conference platform at points throughout the study.

Exclusion

Safety concerns at the time of enrollment, including, but not limited to, a response \>0 on the EPDS question 10 or reported suicidal or self-harm thoughts or behaviors within one year of enrollment
Current substance use disorder
History of a bipolar or psychotic disorder, or current symptoms of psychosis or mania.
  • User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at midpointMidpoint (approximately 3 weeks)

    The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app. Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).

  • User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at post-interventionPost-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)

    The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app. Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).

  • User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) at follow-upFollow-up (approximately 12 weeks)

    The uMARS is a 27-item self-report questionnaire assessing engagement, functionality, aesthetics, information, subjective quality, and perceived impact of an app. Total scores are calculated by averaging the items together, representing an overall perceived app quality score ranging from 1 (inadequate) to 5 (excellent).

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 1 (approximately week 1)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 2 (approximately week 1)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 3 (approximately week 2)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 4 (approximately week 2)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 5 (approximately week 3)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 6 (approximately week 3)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 7 (approximately week 4)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 8 (approximately week 4)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 9 (approximately week 5)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 10 (approximately week 5)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 11 (approximately week 6)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Quantitative Feedback Survey of App Feasibility and AcceptabilityModule 12 (approximately week 6)

    Self-report measures asking for qualitative feedback on module content and user experience.

  • Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at midpointMidpoint (approximately 3 weeks)

    Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant. Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.

  • Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at post-interventionPost-intervention (approximately 6 weeks)

    Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant. Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.

  • Qualitative Feedback of App Feasibility and Acceptability at follow-upFollow-up (approximately 12 weeks)

    Feedback Interviews are qualitative interview-based questionnaires that a member of the research team will lead during a phone or video call with each participant. Items will examine participant response to app content, structure, and functionality, as well as engagement and satisfaction.