Back to search results
NCT05964855

Comparison of Various Prosthetic Foot-Ankle Mechanisms

Enrolling by Invitation
NAAges 18–65InterventionalSupportive care
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
~10 participants
Updated 2025-01-13 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:MIT Variable Stiffness ProsthesisMIT Variable Equilibrium Angle ProsthesisMIT Sliding Beam Passive ProsthesisOssur Pro-flex XCBlatchford Elan Variable-Dampening Prosthesis

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
User device preference for level-ground walking
Measured over From enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)
+2 more outcomes measured

Conditions

Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral

Explore related trials

Transtarsal amputation

Where it's being run

1 sites across 1 states
Massachusetts1

Who to contact

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Person with unilateral transtibial amputation
K3 or K4 Medicare mobility rating
Ages 18-65

Exclusion

Below K3 Medicare mobility rating
Outside of age range (liability and safety reasons)

What this trial measures

  • User device preference for level-ground walkingFrom enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)

    Determine which device the users prefer for level-ground walking by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.

  • User device preference for stair ascent & descentFrom enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)

    Determine which device the users prefer for stair ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.

  • User device preference for sloped ground ascent & descentFrom enrollment to the end of trial (2 sessions, 8 hours total per patient)

    Determine which device the users prefer for 8-degree sloped ground ascent \& descent by gauging user feedback through an evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation units will be a sliding scale ranging from "Very unfavorable" to "Very favorable" with neutral in the middle. Subjects will be asked to rank the 5 interventions from best to worst for the specific task.