Investigating tDCS for Working Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment
This study is looking into how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects working memory in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and in healthy older adults. tDCS is a non-invasive way to stimulate brain regions involved in thinking. Participants will receive either active tDCS or a sham (inactive) tDCS. Researchers will measure changes in working memory accuracy after these stimulations. You might be able to join if you are between 60 and 95 years old, have a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 18 or higher, and can receive electrical stimulation. The study aims to enroll 110 participants, but its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a mechanistic, in-scanner, crossover study with 110 participants, comparing active tDCS to sham tDCS.
- What's involved
- You would participate in training sessions and receive either active or sham electrical stimulation, with working memory accuracy measured at different time points.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Working memory accuracy is measured at 12 minutes, 24 minutes, and 36 minutes after stimulation, with comparisons made at least two weeks apart.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
A Mechanistic Study to Investigate tDCS and Working Memory in MCI Patients
At a glance
Conditions
NCT05998031
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
University of Florida
Gainesville, Floridastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Aprinda I Queen, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Florida
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- 2-back Working Memory Accuracy12 minutes versus 24 minutes, 12 minutes versus 36 minutes. Then at each time point comparing active versus sham stimulation, separated by at least two weeks.
N-back accuracy as working memory performance will be analyzed as a percent accuracy score on the 2-back and 0-back task.