HYDRAFIL-D: HYDRogel Augmentation For Intervertebral Lumbar Discs

This study is testing a new treatment called the ReGelTec HYDRAFIL™ System for people with chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease (DDD). DDD is when the discs between your spinal bones wear down. The HYDRAFIL System uses an injectable gel implant. This study will compare the HYDRAFIL System to standard care, which includes physical therapy and/or pain medication. Researchers want to see if the HYDRAFIL System is safe and effective. You may be able to join if you are between 22 and 85 years old, have had low back pain for at least six months, and have one or two symptomatic discs. The study aims to enroll 225 participants and is currently unclear about its recruitment status. Success will be measured at 12 months.

Study design
This is a multi-center, prospective study that will randomly assign participants to either the ReGelTec HYDRAFIL™ System or conservative care management. The study plans to enroll 225 participants.
What's involved
Not specified in the trial record.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
The primary endpoint for measuring success is at 12 months.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT06011551

HYDRAFIL-D: HYDRogel Augmentation For Intervertebral Lumbar Discs

Recruiting
NAAges 22–85InterventionalTreatment
ReGelTec, Inc.
~225 participants
Updated 2026-09-14 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:The ReGelTec HYDRAFIL™ SystemConservative Care Management

At a glance

Recruiting sites
15 of 16 listed sites are recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Composite Endpoint of Clinical Success
Measured over 12-month
Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)

NCT06011551

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 16 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Alabama Clinical Therapeutics

    Birmingham, Alabamano site contact published

    Recruiting

  • Beam Research (Beam Radiology)

    Calgary, Alberta, Canadano site contact published

    Recruiting

  • Boomerang Healthcare (IPM Medical Group)

    Walnut Creek, Californiano site contact published

    Recruiting

  • Clinical Investigations

    Edmond, Oklahomano site contact published

    Recruiting

  • DBPS Research (The Denver Spine & Pain Institute)

    Greenwood Village, Coloradono site contact published

    Recruiting

  • Horizon Clinical Research (Southern Pain and Spine)

    Jasper, Georgiano site contact published

    Recruiting

  • International Spine, Pain & Performance Center and Mountain Spine & Pain

    Washington D.C., District of Columbiano site contact published

    Not yet recruiting

  • Neuroscience Research Center, LLC

    Overland Park, Kansasno site contact published

    Recruiting

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

  • Douglas Beall, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Clinical Investigations LLC
  • Kasra Amirdelfan, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · IPM Medical Group
Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Male or female subjects aged 22 to 85 years, inclusive
Subjects presenting with LBP greater than leg pain and symptoms of DDD of the lumbar region (L1- S1) of at least six (6) months duration
Presence of one (1) or two (2) symptomatic disc(s) (i.e., only 1-level or 2-levels may be treated during the study) as determined by Discography
Symptomatic disc(s) exhibiting Grade 4 to 8 degeneration on the modified Pfirrmann scale as determined by MRI
Failure to have their symptoms resolve or reduce following at least six (6) months of conservative care (as defined in the body of the protocol)
Psychosocially, mentally and physically able and willing to fully comply with this protocol including adhering to follow-up schedule and requirements and filling out forms
English fluency
Signed informed consent

Exclusion

Active systemic or local infection
Any skin disease or inadequate tissue coverage at the site of the proposed injection
Annular tear or defect that shows free contrast extravasation into the epidural space during or after Discography
Presence of more than two (2) symptomatic discs presenting with pain confirmed during Discography
Presence of extruded or sequestered disc herniation (i.e., disc extrusions or sequestrations) at the symptomatic level(s) or on adjacent levels
Presence of wide annular fissures confluent with large disc protrusions at the symptomatic level(s)
Epidural steroid injection, intradiscal injection, trigger point injection, facet or medial branch block within 60 days of randomization
Opioid medication usage \>60 MME (morphine milligram equivalent)/day or increase in opioid use within 60 days of randomization
Evidence of Modic type 3 changes at the symptomatic level(s) or on adjacent levels
Subjects presenting with nerve pain following a dermatomal distribution and that correlates with nerve compression on imaging where lower limb pain is greater than back pain or by history within the past six (6) months. Note: somatic referred pain is allowed
Evidence of neurogenic claudication due to spinal stenosis
Subjects having had any prior lumbar spine surgery (instrumented or non-instrumented) except: a. A non-instrumented procedure not at the symptomatic or adjacent levels (i.e., discectomy, laminectomy, MILD procedure) is not exclusionary if the procedure was completed at least one (1) year or greater from randomization with complete resolution of treated symptoms and no recurrence
History of vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine
Evidence of severe compression of cauda equina
Evidence of spinal segmental instability (spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis: Grade \>1), severe spinal canal stenosis, isthmus pathology, or scoliosis \[Cobb angle \>20 at the index level(s)\]
Subjects with arachnoiditis
Subjects who are prisoners or wards of courts
Subjects involved in active litigation including worker's compensation cases
Subjects on chronic anticoagulation due to a bleeding disorder and unable to safely stop anticoagulants, or has taken anticoagulants within three (3) days prior to procedure
Subjects with LBP of non-spinal or unknown etiology
Subjects who have a history (in the last five (5) years) of substance abuse or chemical dependency (pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, alcohol) or are current abusers (using definition criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V))
Subjects who have major psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, as defined by the DSM-V
If female, subjects who are pregnant or are trying to become pregnant during the course of the trial (due to risks of additional radiation exposures)
Failure to understand informed consent or inability or unwillingness to adhere to the study follow-up visit schedule or other protocol requirements
Subjects who have participated in any other clinical study within the last three (3) months that, in the opinion of the investigator, could bias the results of the HYDRAFIL-D study, or subjects that are actively participating in any other clinical study, or have planned participation in any other clinical study during the course of this trial. Note: subjects must agree they will not participate in any other clinical study during the course of this trial
Body Mass Index (BMI) \>40 kg/m2
Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the device materials
Endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Inability to undergo X-ray, MRI, CT scans or other radiographic assessments, including Discography
Any comorbid medical condition which, in the best judgement of the Investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study or interferes with the proper assessment of safety or effectiveness (e.g., systemic disease)
Subjects with any active malignancy or who have been previously diagnosed with a malignancy and have evidence of residual disease
Any degenerative or neurological condition that would interfere with evaluation of outcomes or that may generate an unacceptable risk of failure or postoperative complications
Chronic or acute renal and/ or hepatic impairment
Evidence of severe osteoporosis. The SCORE/MORES will be utilized to screen if a DEXA scan is indicated. If SCORE/MORES value ≥ 6; then a DEXA scan is required. Severe osteoporosis is defined as DEXA T-score \< -2.5 (spine or hip) or QCT T-score \< 80mg/cubic cm
  • Composite Endpoint of Clinical Success12-month

    The primary endpoint is a single composite endpoint reflecting five study outcomes (function, SAEs, SSIs, intercurrent events, and radiographic findings). The individual subject's outcome will be considered a success if all of the criteria are met at 12 months.