Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention for Veterans with PTSD
This study is testing two mobile apps for Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and problematic anger. One app, called Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention (MARI), uses techniques to help you interpret situations less hostilely. The other app, Health Education Condition (HED), provides videos on healthy habits. Researchers want to see if MARI can better reduce anger and improve daily life compared to HED. You may be able to join if you are a Veteran with a PTSD diagnosis and a certain level of anger, and your psychiatric medications have been stable for three months. The study will look at how many participants reduce their problematic anger after one month, three months, and six months. The current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This study will involve about 150 participants who will be randomly assigned to use either the MARI app or the HED app.
- What's involved
- You will download an app and be instructed to use it at least 5 times a week for 4 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for six months after the initial treatment period to assess anger levels.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Mobile Anger Reduction Intervention
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06094933
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Kirsten H Dillon, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic angerPost-treatment (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
- number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic anger6-month follow-up
Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
- number of participants below the clinical cut off for problematic anger3-month follow-up
Measured with the Dimensions of Anger Reactions-5 scale; scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating higher levels of problematic anger; the clinical cut off is 12. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a score lower than 12.
- number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scoresfrom baseline to post-treatment assessments (approx. one month after baseline assessment)
Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.
- number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scoresfrom baseline to 3-month follow-up
Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.
- number of participants with decreased hostile interpretation bias scoresfrom baseline to 6-month follow-up
Measured with the Word Sentence Association Paradigm-Hostility, hostility subscale. Scores range from 1-6, with higher scores indicating higher levels hostile interpretation bias. The investigators will count the number of participants in each group who have a reduction in scores within the time frame.