APPRAISE 2.0: Live Trial of the APPRAISE Trauma Decision Support System

This study is testing a new tool called the APPRAISE Trauma Clinical Decision Support System. This system is a device that helps doctors manage patients with wounds and injuries in real-time at the bedside. The study wants to see if the software works correctly without errors and if it helps doctors without causing confusion. It also aims to gather initial information for future, larger studies. You might be able to join if you are an adult (18 years or older) patient in the Emergency Department (ED) who is triaged to the "Acute" area, which is for patients with potentially serious conditions. The study is considered a pilot evaluation and is currently unclear regarding its recruitment status.

Study design: This is a pilot study evaluating a new device. It plans to enroll 20 participants.
What's involved: Not specified in the trial record.
Compensation: Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up: The study measures outcomes from your arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and typically 30 minutes after protocol initiation.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

APPRAISE 2.0: Live Trial of the APPRAISE Trauma Decision Support System

Recruiting

PHASE1Ages 18+InterventionalDevice feasibility

Andrew Tomas Reisner

~20 participants

Updated 2025-05-08 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What's tested:APPRAISE Trauma Clinical Decision Support System

At a glance

Recruiting sites

1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now

RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open

What they're measuring

Software session with error messages or critical software errors

Measured over From patient arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and protocol completion (which is typically 30 min after protocol initiation).

+3 more outcomes measured

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Where it's being run

1 sites across 1 states

Massachusetts1

Study leadership

Andrew Reisner, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Massachusetts General Hospital

Who to contact

Iain Kehoe

[email protected]

6177262241

Email the study team

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Adult (≥18 yrs) Emergency Department (ED) patient

Triaged to the "Acute" area of the ED. (The "Acute" area is the designated area for ED patients with potential or established critical illness. Triage to Acute is a routine ED operation that is performed based on departmental guidelines and the professional judgement of an experienced triage nurse).

Clinical concern for acute injury (based on either an explicitly chief complaint of acute injury, or clinical team with documented concern for acute injury as a relevant part of patient presentation).

Exclusion

Prisoners

Patients known to be pregnant, based on patient report, physical exam, or bedside ultrasound

Patients wearing an "EFIC Opt-Out" bracelet

Any concern about the suitability of the software system for a specific patient by any clinician involved in the patient's ED care, or by the patient themselves (or by any LAR \[lawfully authorized representative\] of the patient).

What this trial measures

Software session with error messages or critical software errorsFrom patient arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and protocol completion (which is typically 30 min after protocol initiation).
Each time the software is used ("session"), a log file is generated. We will quantify how many sessions generate error messages or critical software errors.
Clinician surveys that the software negatively affected patient careFrom patient arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and protocol completion (which is typically 30 min after protocol initiation)
Each time the software is used, clinicians are surveyed whether the software negatively affected patient care, in their professional judgement
Clinician surveys that the software positively affected patient careFrom patient arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and protocol completion (which is typically 30 min after protocol initiation)
Each time the software is used, clinicians are surveyed whether the software negatively affected patient care, in their professional judgement
Clinician surveys that ongoing use of the software poses risks that exceeds benefitsFrom patient arrival in the Emergency Department through enrollment, protocol initiation, and protocol completion (which is typically 30 min after protocol initiation)
Each time the software is used, clinicians are surveyed whether ongoing use of the software poses risks that exceeds benefits

Trialytics