Adaptive Radiotherapy Boost for Head and Neck Cancer
This study is testing if it's possible to use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to adjust a part of radiation therapy for people with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (a type of cancer). All patients will receive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), a precise form of radiation. The goal is to personalize your treatment based on how your body responds, while keeping all treatments within standard care guidelines. The study aims to see if this approach can improve how much radiation healthy organs receive. We are looking for 35 participants aged 18 and older with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 35 participants. It is not specified if it is randomized or blinded.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for up to 15 months to measure the improvement in mean OAR (Organ At Risk) dose reduction.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Phase 2 Trial of Adaptive Radiotherapy Boost for HNSCC
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- George Yang, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Moffitt Cancer Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Improvement in Mean OAR Dose ReductionUp to 15 months
Feasibility of MR adaptive boost technique, as defined as achieving a reduction of mean OAR (parotids, submandibular glands, pharynx, oral cavity, tubarial glands, larynx, esophagus, and thyroid) doses greater than 7.5% compared to unadapted CT based plan. If 18 of 25 patients are meet the mean OAR criteria the approach will be considered feasible.