Studying Exercise and Mindfulness for Brain Function in Children
This study is looking at how different types of short exercise and mindfulness activities affect thinking skills (executive function) in healthy children aged 10 to 12. We are comparing four 20-minute activities: mindfulness with high-intensity interval training (MF-HIIT), mindfulness only (MF-only), high-intensity interval training only (HIIT-only), and sitting rest. We want to see if MF-HIIT has a greater positive effect on how quickly and accurately children can complete tasks, and on their brain activity, compared to the other activities. You can join if you are 10-12 years old, have an IQ of 85 or higher, can exercise, and don't have certain cognitive or neurological conditions. The study aims to enroll 60 participants, but its current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is a randomized cross-over study involving 60 healthy children. Participants will experience each of the four interventions in a random order.
- What's involved
- Participants will complete a 20-minute intervention on four separate days (Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5). Before and after each intervention, their thinking skills will be measured.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Measurements of thinking skills are taken about 10 minutes after each 20-minute intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Acute Effects of High-intensity Interval Training With Mindfulness-based Recovery on Executive Function in Children
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06270589
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Lambert, 800 West Stadium Avenue
West Lafayette, Indianastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Inhibition speedAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
Inhibition speed will be assessed by the response time (ms) during a child-friendly flanker task.
- Inhibition accuracyAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
Inhibition accuracy will be assessed by the response accuracy (%) during a child-friendly flanker task.
- Shifting speedAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
The shifting speed will be assessed by the response time (ms) during a child-friendly switching task.
- Shifting accuracyAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
The shifting accuracy will be assessed by the response accuracy (%) during a child-friendly switching task.
- N2-ERPAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
The N2 component of event-related brain potentials is a neuroelectric index of conflict processing. Increased amplitude of N2 reflects increased neural activation to detect and resolve conflicts.
- P3-ERPAt the baseline before and about 10-min after the 20-min intervention on Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, and Day 5.
The P3 component of event-related brain potentials is a neuroelectric index of attention. Increased amplitude of P3 reflects greater allocation of attentional resources and the decreased latency of P3 reflects the faster information processing speed.