Comparing Entry Techniques in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
This study is looking at two different ways to enter the abdomen during laparoscopic (minimally invasive) gynecologic surgery: "blunt fascial abdominal entry" and "Veress needle abdominal entry." Researchers want to see which method leads to quicker "insufflation" (inflating the abdomen with gas) and successful entry, as well as how these methods affect complications and pain after surgery. You might be able to join if you are an adult woman having conventional laparoscopic surgery at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center with a specific surgeon. You would be randomly assigned to one of the two entry techniques. The study aims to see if the blunt fascial entry technique is faster and just as safe as the Veress needle technique.
- Study design
- This is a single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial that will include 100 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary outcomes, insufflation time and success upon peritoneal entry, are measured during the surgery itself.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Blunt Fascial vs. Veress Needle Peritoneal Entry in Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Raanan Meyer, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
What this trial measures
- Insufflation timeIntraoperative
The time it takes to insufflate the abdominal cavity to 15 mm Hg.
- Success upon peritoneal entryIntraoperative
Successful abdominal entry in the first trial