NCT06359574

Core Competency Model for Corrections

Enrolling by Invitation
NAAges 18–99Interventional
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
~100 participants
Updated 2024-12-06 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Core Competency Model for Corrections (CCM-C) Self-Directed Violence Prevention Training

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Feasibility of the CCM-C training intervention
Measured over Immediately post-training
+3 more outcomes measured
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

NCT06359574

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections

    Raleigh, North Carolinano site contact published

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Behavioral Health Clinician (BHC)
18 years of age or older
Living in the U.S.
Currently employed by the NC DAC

Exclusion

Decisional or cognitive impairments that preclude being able to consent to study participation
Being a member of the study correctional advisory panel (CAP)
  • Feasibility of the CCM-C training interventionImmediately post-training

    Feasibility of CCM-C training as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater feasibility.

  • AcceptabilityImmediately post-training

    Acceptability of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

  • AppropriatenessImmediately post-training

    Appropriateness of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.

  • UsabilityImmediately post-training

    Usability of CCM-C training as measured by the self-report subscale of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM; Weiner et al., 2017); the scale ranges from 5-20 where higher scores indicate greater usability.