Investigating 89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT for Recurrent Kidney Cancer
This study is comparing a new imaging scan, 89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT, to standard contrast-enhanced CT scans. The goal is to see which method is better at finding clear cell renal cell cancer (a type of kidney cancer) that has returned after surgery. For some patients, there's a high chance the cancer might come back, and current scans might miss small cancer cells. The 89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT uses a special antibody (Girentuximab, or GmAb) tagged with a radioactive substance (zirconium-89) to help detect these cancer cells. We are looking for 91 participants aged 18 or older who have clear cell renal cell carcinoma confirmed by biopsy or surgery. The main goal is to see how well each scan finds cancer lesions up to 16 weeks after surgery.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 91 participants. It compares two different imaging methods for detecting recurrent kidney cancer.
- What's involved
- You would undergo blood sample collection, bone scans, CT scans (including PET/CT and brain CT), and potentially an MRI of the brain.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary outcome for lesion detection is measured up to 16 weeks from surgical resection.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
An Investigational Scan (89Zr-DFO-GmAb PET/CT) Compared to Contrast-Enhanced CT for the Detection of Recurrent Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer After Surgery Comparing Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX) PET CT to Conventional PET CT for Post-Op Staging in Kidney Cancer
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06447103
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, Californiastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Brian Shuch · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · UCLA / Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Lesion detection rateUp to 16 weeks from surgical resection
Patients will be treated as binary categorization as follows: (i) Patients who have ≥ 1 lesion confirmed to be recurrent disease will be designated positive (recurrence). (ii) Patients with no lesions detected will be designated negative (no recurrence). The analysis of the primary objective will utilize McNemar's test to compare the detection rate between the imaging techniques.