Back to search results
NCT06501859

Rehabilitation With the Shoulder Pacemaker

Enrolling by Invitation
NAAges 18–80InterventionalTreatment
University of Utah
~100 participants
Updated 2026-06-05 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Standard of care physical therapyShoulder pacemaker with physical therapy

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score
Measured over Pre-operatively
+4 more outcomes measured

Conditions

Shoulder Injuries

Explore related trials

Reverse prosthetic total arthroplasty of shoulder

NCT06501859

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • University of Utah Orthopedics

    Salt Lake City, Utahno site contact published

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

Study leadership

  • Christopher Joyce, M.D. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Utah Orthopaedics

Who to contact

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Patients indicated for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Surgery at University of Utah Facilities
Patients between the ages 18-80.

Exclusion

Prior ipsilateral shoulder arthroplasty
Inability or unwillingness to participate in the rehabilitation protocol
Prior cardiac pacemaker or spinal cord stimulator
Age over 80
History of periscapular surgery
History of ipsilateral neurologic injury
Prisoners
Patients requiring prolonged immobilization deviating from standard protocol
Patients who have an implantable medical device or other electrical device.

What this trial measures

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scorePre-operatively

    Shoulder specific scoring system out of 100. A patient-reported score with visual analog scale for pain and functional subscales ranging from 0 (worse pain and function loss) to 50 (no pain and excellent function). Both scores are summed for a maximum score of 100.

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score6 weeks after surgery

    Shoulder specific scoring system out of 100. A patient-reported score with visual analog scale for pain and functional subscales ranging from 0 (worse pain and function loss) to 50 (no pain and excellent function). Both scores are summed for a maximum score of 100.

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score3 months after surgery

    Shoulder specific scoring system out of 100. A patient-reported score with visual analog scale for pain and functional subscales ranging from 0 (worse pain and function loss) to 50 (no pain and excellent function). Both scores are summed for a maximum score of 100.

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score6 months after surgery

    Shoulder specific scoring system out of 100. A patient-reported score with visual analog scale for pain and functional subscales ranging from 0 (worse pain and function loss) to 50 (no pain and excellent function). Both scores are summed for a maximum score of 100.

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score1 year after surgery

    Shoulder specific scoring system out of 100. A patient-reported score with visual analog scale for pain and functional subscales ranging from 0 (worse pain and function loss) to 50 (no pain and excellent function). Both scores are summed for a maximum score of 100.