HARP Pilot 2: Understanding Alcohol, Cannabis, and Medications in People with HIV
This study, called HARP Pilot 2, is looking at how alcohol use, cannabis use, and certain medications affect falls and thinking abilities in people living with HIV. Specifically, it focuses on those taking five or more non-HIV medications, especially ones that can affect the brain, like benzodiazepines or sleeping medications. The study will use a behavioral intervention called Information Motivation Behavioral and Motivational Interviewing (IMB-MI), delivered by a clinical pharmacist. The pharmacist will discuss the risks of alcohol and cannabis use, especially when combined with these other medications. The main goal is to see if it's possible to enroll 100 participants and successfully deliver this intervention. You might be able to join if you are 50 or older, have HIV, have recently visited a local VA, currently drink alcohol, and take five or more non-HIV medications, including one that affects the brain. People who are currently hospitalized or have an Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) cannot participate.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 100 participants. The phase of the study is not specified.
- What's involved
- Before starting the intervention, you will be contacted by phone to verify alcohol use and provide verbal consent. You will also perform a self-administered blood spot test and have a brief call with a clinical pharmacist for a medication review. The intervention itself will be delivered by a clinical pharmacist.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your completion of study items will be measured for up to 9 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
HIV and Alcohol Research Center Focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) Pilot 2 (2nd HARP Pilot Intervention)
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Amy C Justice, MD, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Yale University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Feasibility: Ability to meet enrollment target of 100 participantsWeek -2 to Week 0
Enrollment of 100 Participants: Week -2: Gather list of 100 eligible patients from the online VACS-HIV Index database; Send opt-out letter with study information and contact number. Week -2 to Week 0: Track patients for 2 weeks and note which have opted out. Week 0: Contact patients who have not opted-out; enroll, screen, and conduct medication reconciliation phone call; Send out pre-intervention package.
- Feasibility: Ability to deliver the complete interventionWeek 3 and week 7
Week 3: 1-hour intervention call between VA clinical pharmacist and participant Week 7: 30-minute booster call between VA clinical pharmacist and participant
- Feasibility:Percentage of Completion of Study Itemsup to Month 9
Percentage of completion of study items (Pre-Intervention Survey, Phosphatidylethanol Test, Post-Intervention Survey, 6-Month Post Intervention Survey, Phosphatidylethanol Test 2). Higher percentage indicates more completion of study items.
- Acceptability: comfort, comprehensibility/helpfulness of contentWeek 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3
Assessed using a series of multiple-choice feedback and open-ended questions on Post-Intervention Survey and 6-Month Post Intervention Survey and a series of prompts on final semi-structured interview focused on feedback from participant
- Acceptability: acceptability of PEth testsWeek 7, Month 9 and Month 9,Week 3
Assessed using a series of multiple-choice feedback and open-ended questions on Post-Intervention Survey and 6-Month Post Intervention Survey and a series of prompts on final semi-structured interview focused on feedback from participant