Back to search results
NCT06597955

Large-Scale Implementation of a Decision Aid About Colorectal Cancer Screening

Enrolling by Invitation
Not specifiedAges 18+Observational
Indiana University
~400 participants
Updated 2026-06-25 on ClinicalTrials.gov

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Shared decision making
Measured over 18 months
+1 more outcome measured

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Explore related trials

Colorectal Carcinoma

Where it's being run

1 sites across 1 states
Indiana1

Study leadership

  • Peter H. Schwartz, MD, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Indiana University
  • Teresa M. Damush, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Indiana University

Who to contact

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Healthcare system participants will be eligible if they are employed by one of the project team's partner healthcare systems
Patient participants will be eligible if they are considered due for colorectal cancer screening by the healthcare systems' criteria.

Exclusion

are not between ages of 45 - 75 years old
self-report that they no longer receive primary care at either of the project team's partner healthcare systems
self-report that they are not due for colorectal cancer screening (had colonoscopy within the past 10 years, sigmoidoscopy in the last 5 years, FIT in the past year, or Cologuard in the past 3 years)
are unable to speak or read English or Spanish

What this trial measures

  • Shared decision making18 months

    Shared decision making will be assessed using the CollaboRATE scale. CollaboRATE is a three-item measure that assesses three key areas of shared decision making; 1) explaining the health issue; 2) asking for patient preferences; and 3) incorporating patient preferences into the decision. Each item uses 0 - 9 likert response options ranging from 0 = "no effort was made" to 9 = "every effort was made". The higher the score the better the shared decision making.

  • Implementation of decision aid18 months

    Interviews with healthcare system leadership, clinicians, staff and patients