Bone Mineral Density Agreement Study Between EOSedge™ Versus Traditional DXA
This study aims to compare bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from two different low-dose X-ray scans: EOSedge™ and traditional DXA. We want to see if the T-scores (a measure of bone density) calculated from both types of scans agree. You might be able to join if you are healthy and need an EOSedge™ scan for a spine or orthopedic condition as part of your regular medical care. The study is looking for 214 participants. The main goal is to see how well the T-scores from the two different X-ray methods match up.
- Study design
- This is a multi-center, prospective, controlled study comparing two imaging methods. It plans to enroll 214 participants.
- What's involved
- You will have both an EOSedge™ scan and a DXA scan, ideally on the same day but possibly up to 60 days apart. You will also complete a questionnaire and provide some demographic and diagnostic information.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your participation will conclude after both EOSedge™ and DXA scans are completed and evaluable images are acquired.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Bone Mineral Density Agreement Study Between EOSedge™ Versus Traditional DXA
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
4 sites across 4 statesWho to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
What this trial measures
- AP Spine T-score Agreementbetween 0-60 days
Calculation of EOSedge BMD will be post-processed from the bi-planar EOSedge 2E radiographs, and is measured in g/cm² surface mass on four lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) in the anteroposterior (AP) projection. BMD results from the conventional DXA system will be similarly acquired from the spine (AP L1-L4) exam, and the paired T-scores derived from the BMD results will be tested for statistical agreement across the two systems.