Adding Tivozanib to Immunotherapy for High-Risk Kidney Cancer
This study is testing if adding the anti-cancer drug tivozanib to pembrolizumab (an immunotherapy) works better than pembrolizumab alone for people with high-risk kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma) after surgery. Pembrolizumab helps your body's immune system fight cancer. Tivozanib is a kinase inhibitor, which means it blocks signals that help cancer cells grow and spread. Researchers want to see if combining these two treatments improves how long people live without their cancer returning. You may be able to join if you are 18 or older and have a confirmed diagnosis of clear cell kidney cancer that has been completely removed by surgery. The main goal is to see how long patients remain disease-free.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study planning to enroll 1040 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pembrolizumab with tivozanib or pembrolizumab alone.
- What's involved
- You would receive pembrolizumab intravenously and potentially tivozanib orally. You would also have blood samples taken, and undergo MRI or CT scans throughout the trial.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Your disease-free survival will be assessed from the time you are randomly assigned to a treatment group until your disease returns or you pass away, for up to 10 years.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Testing the Addition of the Anti-Cancer Drug Tivozanib to Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) After Surgery to Remove All Known Sites of Kidney Cancer
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06661720
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 425 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesotastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Addison Gilbert Hospital
Gloucester, Massachusettsstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
AdventHealth Hendersonville
Hendersonville, North Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
AdventHealth Infusion Center Asheville
Asheville, North Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
AdventHealth Infusion Center Haywood
Clyde, North Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
AdventHealth Infusion Center Weaverville
Weaverville, North Carolinastudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinoisstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital
Downers Grove, Illinoisstudy coordinator listed
Recruiting
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
What this trial measures
- Disease-free survival (DFS)From time of randomization until disease recurrence or death, assessed up to 10 years
The primary analysis will be a comparison of DFS between the two study arms using a stratified log-rank test. The treatment effect will be estimated with a hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval obtained from a stratified Cox model with treatment group (experimental group versus control group) as the explanatory variable. Interim analyses: There will be several futility analyses for the trial. These analyses will employ the linear 20% method proposed by Freidlin, Korn and Gray. Based on the current design parameters, the first analysis would be performed at 37% information (99 DFS events), and the trial would be stopped for futility if the observed hazard ratio (experimental versus \[vs.\] control) were worse than 1. Additional analyses will be performed at 50% (133 DFS events), 60% (159 DFS events), and 70% information (186 DFS events), the trial would be stopped for futility if the observed HR were worse than 0.983, 0.971 and 0.959, respectively.