Observational Study of Vanzacaftor/Tezacaftor/Deutivacaftor (VTD) in Cystic Fibrosis
This observational study, called RETRIAL, is for people with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) aged 6 and older. It looks at what happens when you start a new triple-therapy medicine called vanzacaftor/tezacaftor/deutivacaftor (VTD). This study is for those who previously had to change or stop taking elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) because of new or worsening mental health symptoms (like depression, anxiety, or brain fog) or liver problems. Researchers want to see how often people need to stop or change their VTD dose due to mental health issues, how many experience worsening mental health symptoms, and if there are changes in thinking abilities. You will complete surveys and some assessments over about a year.
- Study design
- This is an observational study involving about 200 participants with Cystic Fibrosis. It tracks participants over time without assigning them to different treatment groups.
- What's involved
- You will complete daily diaries for 6 weeks, biweekly surveys for 6 months, and quarterly surveys for a year. You may also have a research liver function test and a neurocognitive assessment.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for up to 12 months after starting VTD to monitor mental health symptoms and other outcomes.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Restarting Triple Therapy With Robust Monitoring for Adverse Events (RETRIAL)
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
18 sites across 14 statesStudy leadership
- Anna Georgiopoulos, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Massachusetts General Hospital
- CJ Bathgate, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · National Jewish Health
- Janis Stoll, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Washington University at St. Louis
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- RETRIAL-Mental Health (1st objective - discontinuation): one-year incidence of discontinuation or change from VTD standard dosing due to new/worsening mental health symptoms.Baseline to Month 12
Discontinuation or change from VTD standard dosing due to mental health symptoms at any time during the one-year follow-up as reported in either: daily diaries, biweekly or quarterly surveys, or chart review.
- RETRIAL-Mental Health (2nd objective - symptoms): proportion of participants that experience any worsening in mental health symptoms during the 6-month follow-upBaseline to Month 6
Change from baseline that exceeds the minimally-important difference (MID) / minimally-important change (MIC) within the first 6 months after starting VTD in any of the following patient-reported outcome measures: (1) depression (PHQ-8 or PROMIS depression parent proxy), (2) anxiety (GAD-7 or PROMIS anxiety parent proxy), (3) anger and irritability (PROMIS-anger or PROMIS-anger parent proxy), (4) cognitive functioning (PROMIS- cognitive function or PROMIS-cognitive function parent proxy), (5) sleep disturbance (PROMIS-sleep disturbance or PROMIS-sleep disturbance parent proxy).
- RETRIAL-Mental Health (3rd objective - RETRIAL-Neuro): proportion of participants that have a worsening on the NIH Toolbox's Fluid Cognition Composite score at 1 month follow-up.Baseline to Day 30
Decrease in age-adjusted standard score from baseline to 1 month on the NIH Toolbox's Fluid Cognition Composite Score (a performance-based neurocognitive measure) that exceeds MIC ≥ 7.5 points, signifying a worsening in function.
- RETRIAL-Liver: one-year incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with VTD, defined by expert consensus after review of clinical and laboratory data.Baseline to Month 12
Positive DILI diagnosis, including those characterized as "likely," "probable," and "highly probable," as reviewed by a hepatology panel of three experts who assign these likelihood scores based upon review of case report forms, including a specific clinical narrative and laboratory values assessing for other potential etiologies.