Community-based Implementation of Adapted STAC for Blood Pressure in Pregnancy
This study is looking at how to best adapt and implement the Staying Healthy After Childbirth (STAC) program for Black women and birthing persons. STAC is an intervention that provides a home blood pressure monitor and access to a healthcare team to help manage high blood pressure (hypertension) after childbirth. The goal is to understand what helps and what makes it difficult to put this program into practice, and what changes are needed to make it work well for this community. This study is currently unclear on its recruitment status and plans to enroll 46 participants. Success will be measured by understanding the barriers, facilitators, and necessary adaptations to the STAC program.
- Study design
- This study is an interventional study with a planned enrollment of 46 participants. It is a qualitative investigation focused on understanding the implementation of an adapted intervention.
- What's involved
- If you are a patient, you would participate in interviews and surveys as part of PDSA cycles (Plan-Do-Study-Act, a method for improving processes). These cycles involve 3-5 patients each, for a total of 10 patients.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The study will gather information on barriers and facilitators to implementation for up to 4 weeks, and adaptations to STAC for up to 8 weeks.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Community-based Implementation of Adapted STAC
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06689930
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsinno site contact published
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Kara Hoppe, DO, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Andrew Garbacz, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Wisconsin, Madison
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Qualitative Summary of Barriers to Implementation of A-STACup to 4 weeks
Barriers to implementation of A-STAC in CBOs will be investigated via qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with STAC-CAB members. All feedback regarding barriers will be coded for themes summarized by participant count.
- Qualitative Summary of Facilitators to Implementation of A-STACup to 4 weeks
Facilitators to implementation of A-STAC in CBOs will be investigated via qualitative analysis of interviews and focus groups with STAC-CAB members. All feedback regarding facilitators will be coded for themes summarized by participant count.
- Qualitative Summary of Adaptations to STACup to 8 weeks
Adaptations to STAC will be analyzed from patient participant interviews and CBO staff participants post-PDSA cycles. Interviews will be coded for themes summarized by count.
- The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)up to 8 weeks
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) measures intervention acceptability with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability.
- The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)up to 8 weeks
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) measures intervention appropriateness with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability.
- The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)up to 8 weeks
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) measures intervention feasibility with 4 items ranked on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 = Completely Disagree to 5 = Completely Agree. Higher scores indicate higher acceptability.