Understanding How Information Design Affects Health Literacy
This study is looking at how different ways of presenting information, called "data report back," can help people better understand health and environmental information. Researchers want to see if graphical, art-infused, or geospatial (map-based) designs change how much people learn about health and the environment, their awareness of risks, and their confidence in taking action. The study will measure changes in your understanding and skills through questionnaires over 78 weeks. They are testing this in people of all ages, from 10 years old and up, who live in Pinal County, Arizona; Gila County, Arizona; or Cuyahoga County, Ohio. The goal is to find the best ways to share important health information with different communities. The study plans to enroll 1546 participants.
- Study design
- This interventional study will involve 1546 participants. It compares three different ways of presenting information: graphical, art-infused, and geospatial designs.
- What's involved
- You would complete questionnaires to assess your literacy, knowledge, and skills. This will happen from when you join the study until the end of treatment at 78 weeks.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- You will be followed from enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Disentangling the Role of Culture, Life Stage, and Information Design to Facilitate Equity in Data Report Back
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, PhD, Environmental Science · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Arizona
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Changes from baseline in the mean literacy and numeracy based on questionnaire responses.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
Likert scale where one is equivalent to "Disagree Very Strongly" and six is Agree Very Strongly.
- Changes from baseline in the mean knowledge and awareness risks based on questionnaire responses.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
Likert scale where one is equivalent to "Disagree Very Strongly" and six is Agree Very Strongly.
- Changes from baseline in the mean skills and self-efficacy based on questionnaire responses.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
Likert scale where one is equivalent to "Disagree Very Strongly" and six is Agree Very Strongly.
- Changes from baseline in the mean environmental health engagement based on questionnaire responses.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
Likert scale where one is equivalent to "Disagree Very Strongly" and six is Agree Very Strongly.
- Number of participants reporting themes related to literacy and numeracy.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
This is a qualitative analysis; words will be coded and analyzed to identify themes and sentiment's that arise in individual interviews and across all interviews and focus groups.
- Number of participants reporting themes related to knowledge and awareness risksFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
This is a qualitative analysis; words will be coded and analyzed to identify themes and sentiment's that arise in individual interviews and across all interviews and focus groups.
- Number of participants reporting themes related to skills and self-efficacyFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
This is a qualitative analysis; words will be coded and analyzed to identify themes and sentiment's that arise in individual interviews and across all interviews and focus groups.
- Number of participants reporting themes related to environmental health engagement.From enrollment to the end of treatment at 78 weeks
This is a qualitative analysis; words will be coded and analyzed to identify themes and sentiment's that arise in individual interviews and across all interviews and focus groups.