Polymotion Hip Resurfacing System for Hip Osteoarthritis and Dysplasia

This study is looking at the safety and effectiveness of the Polymotion Hip Resurfacing (PHR) System. This system is a type of hip surgery that aims to be an alternative to a total hip replacement, especially for younger, more active individuals. It involves replacing only the surface of the hip joint, rather than removing the entire ball and socket. Researchers will compare the PHR System to traditional total hip replacement surgery. You might be able to join if you are between 21 and 65 years old and need hip resurfacing due to non-inflammatory arthritis (like osteoarthritis) or mild hip dysplasia. The main goal is to see how safe and effective the PHR System is after 24 months. The current status of this study is unclear.

Study design
This is an interventional study planning to enroll 238 participants. It compares the Polymotion Hip Resurfacing System to total hip arthroplasty.
What's involved
Not specified in the trial record.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
The primary goal of the study will be measured at 24 months after the intervention.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT06792539

Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Polymotion Hip Resurfacing (PHR) System Compared to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Active, Not Recruiting
NAAges 21–65InterventionalTreatment
JointMedica Inc.
~238 participants
Updated 2026-05-01 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Polymotion Hip Resurfacing (PHR) System

At a glance

Recruiting sites
0 of 9 listed sites are recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the Polymotion Hip Resurfacing System.
Measured over 24 months
Osteoarthritis of the Hip
Degenerative Joint Disease of Hip
Dysplasia; Hip

NCT06792539

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 9 sites. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Florida Medical Clinic Orlando Health

    Tampa, Floridano site contact published

  • Hampton Road Orthopaedics

    Newport News, Virginiano site contact published

  • Joint Implant Surgeons

    New Albany, Ohiono site contact published

  • Midlands Orthopaedics & Neurosurgery

    Columbia, South Carolinano site contact published

  • NYU Longone

    New York, New Yorkno site contact published

  • Oregon Health & Science University

    Portland, Oregonno site contact published

  • Orthopaedic and Physiotherapy Associates

    Paget, Trevelyan, Bermudano site contact published

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinoisno site contact published

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

  • Michael Mont, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Principal Investigator

This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov

  • The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the Polymotion Hip Resurfacing System.24 months

    The proportion of Polymotion subjects achieving Month-24 composite clinical success (CCS) will be compared to a propensity-score matched total hip arthroplasty control group collected from Rush University Medical Center, with the goal of demonstrating non-inferiority. Composite clinical success will be analyzed via Harris Hip Scores measuring pain, activity, and function, absence of device subsidence, progressive radiolucencies, osteolysis or migration through radiographic assessment, and the absence of serious safety events (secondary surgical interventions for the index hip or serious device-related adverse events).