Social Cognition Training for Huntington's Disease

This study is exploring a behavioral intervention called Social Cognition Training for individuals with Huntington's Disease (HD). Social cognition refers to the skills that help us understand other people's thoughts and feelings, like recognizing emotions from faces or voices. This training aims to improve these skills, which can be challenging for people with HD and impact their social interactions and well-being. To join, you must be between 18 and 65 years old, have a genetic diagnosis of HD, and be a native English speaker. The study will measure how many people are willing to consider and complete the training, and how easy they find it. The study is currently unclear about its recruitment status and plans to enroll 20 participants.

Study design
This is an interventional study planning to enroll 20 participants. It is not specified if it's randomized or blinded.
What's involved
Not specified in the trial record.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
The primary outcomes are measured at 32 months, suggesting a follow-up period of at least that duration.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT06828471

Social Cognition Training in Individuals With Huntington's Disease

Recruiting
NAAges 18–65Interventional
Rush University Medical Center
~20 participants
Updated 2025-12-10 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Social Cognition Training

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Proportion of participants willing to consider study out of those who have been approached
Measured over 32 months
+3 more outcomes measured
Huntington's Disease (HD)

NCT06828471

Where you'd take part

This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinoisstudy coordinator listed

    Recruiting

Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Want this trial checked against your situation?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Diagnosed with Huntington's Disease based on genetic testing
Must be between 18 and 65 years of age
Native English speaker who is literate in English
Stable psychotropic medication regimen for 4 weeks
Must have a score of "somewhat easily" on all items in the CPQ-12
MOCA \>18
Completed 12 years of schooling
Access to laptop or mobile device
Willingness to come in person 6-12 weeks after first visit
Lives with patient
Must be between 18 and 65 years of age
Native English speaker who is literate in English
MOCA \>26
Willingness to come in person within 6-12 weeks after first visit

Exclusion

Any known neurological condition (other than Huntington's Disease).
History of learning and/or intellectual disabilities
Currently actively involved in any other interventional trial (i.e. have begun the intervention) or within 4 weeks of completing the final assessments of an interventional trial.
Currently regularly completing a computerized cognitive training intervention.
Active suicidal ideation with some intent
Inability to provide informed consent
Active suicidal ideation with some intent
  • Proportion of participants willing to consider study out of those who have been approached32 months
  • Number of participants who adhered and completed the study32 months
  • Ease of program on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being "very easy."32 months
  • Participant satisfaction with the program32 months

    This will be a qualitative measure. The study staff will elicit from the participants what they liked about the program, what they did not like about the program, and what they would change about the program if they could.