Understanding Kidney Disease Care for Native Hawaiians
This study aims to improve care for Native Hawaiians with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Native Hawaiians experience higher rates of kidney disease and often start dialysis at a younger age. This research will test a "culturally informed care coordination intervention" to see if it helps people manage their kidney health better. You may be eligible if you are a Native Hawaiian adult (18 or older) with early-stage CKD (eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and/or UACR greater or equal to 30 mg/g), have recently participated in the NKFH KEDS Program, and can read and write English. The study will look at how acceptable, adoptable, and feasible this new intervention is over 9 months. The study plans to enroll 120 participants, but its current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 120 participants to compare a culturally informed care coordination intervention with usual care.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary outcomes will be measured at 9 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Barriers/Facilitators and Care Coordination of Native Hawaiians & Kidney Disease
At a glance
Conditions
NCT06843603
Where you'd take part
This study runs at 1 site. They're the same protocol — you choose where, and that choice sets who your contact draft is addressed to.
National Kidney Foundation of Hawaii
Honolulu, Hawaiistudy coordinator listed
Sites open and close at different times, so the status above is per site — it can differ from the study's overall status.
Study leadership
- Merle R Kataoka-Yahiro, DrPH., MPH., MS. · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · University of Hawaii at Manoa
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Want this trial checked against your situation?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
What this trial measures
- Acceptability to Intervention9 months
Acceptability (the degree to which an intervention is perceived a good fit) Acceptability will be measured by a survey likert scale of 1 (not acceptable) - 10 (most acceptable) Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.
- Adoption of the Intervention9 months
Adoption (intent to implement) Adoption will be scored as 0 (not at all implemented), 5 (somewhat implemented), and 10 (fully implemented). Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.
- Feasibility of the Intervention9 months
Feasibility (possibility of successful implementation), Feasibility will be measured by a survey likert scale of 1 (not feasible) - 10 (most feasible). Name of measurement tool is reference in Procter et al (p. 69): Procter E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research, conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2022: 38 (2): 65-76.