Extending the Reach of Evidence-based Practices to Support Student's Attention and Behavior Through Technology
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Miguel Villodas, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Department of Psychology, College of Sciences, San Diego State University
- Linda Pfiffner, PhD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco
Who to contact
This trial hasn't published a contact. View it on ClinicalTrials.gov
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- System Usability ScaleDuring the 4th week of intervention and following the last week of the 8-week intervention
This is a psychometrically validated questionnaire will be administered to school mental health professionals, teachers, and parents to assess how easy and user-friendly an interface or digital tool is for its users. This is a 10-item technology agnostic scale assessing technology product usability, with scores above 80 indicating good usability (Brooke, 2014; Lewis \& Sauro, 2009, 2018). The SUS has high internal consistency (α=.91) and high convergent validity with a separate rating of usability and user satisfaction (r=.8).
- The Feasibility Rating ScaleDuring the 4th week of intervention and following the last week of the 8-week intervention
This will be completed by principals, teachers, and school mental health professionals. This measure will contain items regarding the amount of time required to participate in the program, the level of effort needed to identify and enroll students in the program, the availability of physical space needed to run in-person groups, etc. We will query SMHPs weekly (real time) about CLS-D demands on their time, with specific questions regarding their use of the dHealth tool.