Comparing F-18 NaF PET/CT to F-18 FDG PET/CT for Head and Neck Cancer
This study is comparing a new imaging scan, F-18 NaF PET/CT, to the standard scan, F-18 FDG PET/CT, to see how radiation therapy affects blood vessels in the neck of people with head and neck cancers. Radiation therapy can sometimes impact these blood vessels, which supply blood to the brain. Researchers want to understand if F-18 NaF PET/CT can better show these changes. You may be eligible if you are 18 or older and have certain types of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, including HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. The study aims to see if the new scan can more accurately detect vascular complications and inflammation caused by radiation. The current recruitment status is unclear.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 20 participants. It compares two different imaging approaches in patients receiving either intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).
- What's involved
- You would receive F-18 NaF intravenously and undergo PET/CT scans within 28 days of your standard F-18 FDG PET/CT scans, both before and about 12 weeks after your radiation therapy.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- After completing the study interventions, participants will have a follow-up within one to five business days. Researchers will also measure vascular complications and inflammation for up to 6 months.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Comparing an Investigational Scan (F-18 NaF PET/CT) to Standard of Care Imaging (F-18 FDG PET/CT) for Evaluating Vascular Complications in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Amol M Takalkar, MD, MS, MBA, FACNM · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Emory University
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Radiation-induced vascular complicationsPrior to and after undergoing radiation therapy, up to 6 months
Will compare the presence and extent of radiation therapy (RT)-induced vascular complications between the two treatment modalities. The average standardized uptake volume (SUV) max and mean of fludeoxyglucose F-18 (FDG)- and sodium fluoride F-18 (NaF)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans pre- and post RT will be computed. Will assess the change in average SUVmax and SUVmean of FDG- and NaF-PET/CT scans pre- and post-RT. Will also assess the difference in average SUV mean between proton and photon RT. Will assess the difference in change in SUV mean between intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMPT) using a two-sample independent t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test for each SUVmean/max. A multivariable linear regression model with a backward elimination approach will be used to test the effect of clinicopathological variables on the change in SUVmax.
- Radiation-induced vascular inflammation following IMRT or IMPTBaseline up to 6 months
Will evaluate the presence and extent of radiation-induced vascular inflammation following IMRT versus IMPT. Will determine the correlation between the actual radiation dose and radiation-induced vascular inflammation, measured by the average SUVmax/mean, and will be done using Pearson's correlation or Spearman's correlation analysis, as appropriate.
- Percentage volumetric doseBaseline up to 6 months
The percentage volumetric dose will be recorded to determine the correlation between the actual radiation dose and the radiation-induced vascular inflammation, measured by the average SUVmax/mean, and will be done using Pearson's correlation or Spearman's correlation analysis, as appropriate.