Improving Cochlear Implant Follow-ups and Programming

This study is looking at ways to make follow-up care for new Cochlear Americas cochlear implant users more efficient. Researchers want to see if reducing the number of scheduled follow-up visits, specifically removing the 1-week appointment, still leads to good hearing outcomes. They are also testing a new programming method called "population mean mapping" to see if it can achieve similar results to traditional mapping while taking less time. You might be able to join if you are an adult (18-85 years old) who has recently chosen a Cochlear Americas device, can speak English, and are able to do hearing tests. The study will measure your speech understanding and how long programming sessions take after one year to see if these changes are effective.

Study design
This interventional study plans to enroll 48 participants. It is not specified if it is randomized or blinded.
What's involved
You would participate in follow-up visits after your cochlear implant activation, with the 1-week visit removed. You will also undergo a specific programming strategy.
Compensation
Not stated in the trial record.
Follow-up
Your speech perception and programming session duration will be measured at 1-year.

AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.

NCT06960616

Improving Clinical Efficiency by Reducing Scheduled Follow-ups Using Cochlear America's Population Mean Mapping Strategy

Recruiting
NAAges 18–85InterventionalTreatment
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
~48 participants
Updated 2026-05-20 on ClinicalTrials.gov
What's tested:Changes in traditional follow-upPopulation mean mapping

At a glance

Recruiting sites
1 of 1 listed site is recruiting right now
RecruitingSuspended, closed, or not yet open
What they're measuring
Speech perception scores
Measured over 1-year
+1 more outcome measured
Deafness
Cochlear Hearing Loss
1 sites across 1 states
Massachusetts1
  • Julie Arenberg · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · Massachusetts Eye and Ear

Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.

Do you actually qualify for this trial?

Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.

Check eligibility for this trial ~2 min · HIPAA-protected · delete anytime
Eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Postlingually deafened
Adults (18+)
New cochlear implant recipients with Cochlear Americas devices; identified prior to activation
Able to perform follow-up testing tasks (repeating words/sentences, indicating they heard a sound stimulus, completing questionnaires)
English speakers

Exclusion

Patients who select other cochlear implant manufactured devices
Pre-lingually deafened
Multiple disabilities
Unable to perform follow-up testing tasks (repeating words/sentences, indicating they heard a sound stimulus, completing questionnaires)
Non-English speakers
Children under the age of 18
  • Speech perception scores1-year

    Speech perception scores via CNC word lists (percentages) at each visit. Scores are from 0 to 100% with 100% being the best.

  • Duration of programming session1-year

    Time spent programming (seconds) at each visit