Visual Tools for Surgeon Decision-making in Prostate and Kidney Cancer
This study is looking at how visual tools can help cancer surgeons make decisions for patients with newly diagnosed localized prostate or kidney cancer. The study will involve surgeons viewing a visual decision support tool before talking with patients about their treatment options. Researchers want to see if using these visual tools changes how risks and benefits of surgery are discussed between doctors and patients. You can join if you are 18 or older and are willing to participate. The study aims to enroll 220 participants, and the current status is unclear.
- Study design
- This is an interventional study comparing patient encounters before and after surgeons use a visual decision support tool. It plans to enroll up to 20 surgeons and capture 200 patient visits.
- What's involved
- Your patient-doctor conversation will be audio recorded, and you will complete surveys about your communication with your doctor.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- The primary endpoint, discussion of risks and benefits, is measured at the baseline patient-physician encounter.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Designing Visual Tools to Enhance Cancer Surgeon Decision-making
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
2 sites across 1 statesStudy leadership
- Hung-Jui Tan, MD · PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR · UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Who to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
Do you actually qualify for this trial?
Add a private profile and we'll compare every criterion below against your situation — and tell you which ones are met, uncertain, or excluding.
Inclusion
Exclusion
What this trial measures
- Discussion of Risks and BenefitsBaseline (Patient-Physician Encounter)
The impact of visual decision support on patient-physician communication will be assessed using coding-based thematic analysis of the debriefing interviews. The Informed Decision-Making coding system, which includes 9 elements which includes the nature of the clinical problem (e.g., cancer mortality risk, life expectancy), treatment options (e.g., surgery, alternatives), risks and benefits (e.g., complications, side effects, functional outcomes), and uncertainties (e.g., range of possible outcomes). Audio-recorded patient encounters will be coded. Paired coders will score these domains as a 0 (absent), 1 (partial, brief, or one-way), or 2 (complete, two-way discussion).