Tibial IMN Vs. Tibial Micromotion IMN for Tibial Fractures
This study is looking at two different types of intramedullary nails (IMNs) used to fix unstable tibial fractures (broken shin bones). You would receive either a standard IMN or a micromotion IMN, which is designed to allow tiny movements at the fracture site that might help with healing. Researchers want to see if the micromotion IMN leads to better healing rates after surgery, specifically by comparing how well the bones unite (join together) at six months. To join, you must be 18 or older with an unstable tibial fracture that needs surgery. This study aims to understand which type of nail works best to improve patient care.
- Study design
- This interventional study plans to enroll 372 participants. It compares two different types of intramedullary nails for treating tibial fractures.
- What's involved
- Not specified in the trial record.
- Compensation
- Not stated in the trial record.
- Follow-up
- Participants will be followed for at least six months to assess bone union rates.
AI-generated from the public study record. Only the study team can confirm whether you're eligible — confirm details with them before making decisions.
Tibial IMN Vs. Tibial Micromotion IMN
At a glance
Conditions
Where it's being run
1 sites across 1 statesWho to contact
Opens a ready-to-send draft in your own email app — review before sending.
What this trial measures
- Compare post-operative union ratessix months
Compare post-operative union rates in tibial shaft patients treated with 2 types of intramedullary rod fixation devices.